On Tuesday 24 May 2005 21:33, ashwin tanugula wrote:
> Hi!
> When i tried to generate a patch, it gave me the following erros
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ashwin # diff -Naur
> /home/ashwin/uml/linux-2.6.0-test9/ linu x-2.6.0-test9/ >
> umlppc-patch1-2.6.0-test9
> diff: /home/ashwin/uml/linux-2.6.0-
Hi!
When i tried to generate a patch, it gave me the following erros
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ashwin # diff -Naur
/home/ashwin/uml/linux-2.6.0-test9/ linu x-2.6.0-test9/ >
umlppc-patch1-2.6.0-test9
diff: /home/ashwin/uml/linux-2.6.0-test9/include/asm/arch: No such
file or direc tory
diff: /home/ash
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 05:19:08PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> (none):/etc# pwconv
> pwconv: can't lock passwd file
>
> Any ideas on this?
strace it and see what failed.
Jeff
---
This SF.Net email is spons
Yeah, that was the first thing I tried.
I actually found a solution. It was to remove the tap device through
ifconfig first. Then the incomplete arp entry would be removed and I could
restart the tap network.
I wonder if because my tap devices are persistent they caused the arp entry
to stay t
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 04:57, Dinesh Ahuja wrote:
> > Try cleaning the tree with mrproper (save your
> > .config first) and using
> > make linux ARCH=um
> > (and make modules ARCH=um if you use modules)
> > for the build.
> I have cleaned tree using make mrproper ARCH=um
> command.
> And after tha
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 02:00, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 08:04:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 May 2005 22:07, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:43:44AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > I checked the archives for thi
Hello,
On a user-mode server I'm
running I occasionally run into the problem where a machine goes down and my ARP
table shows an (incomplete) entry for the server that went down. That
incomplete arp entry does not seem to go away even if I try deleting manually
with the arp -d command.
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:26:11PM +0800, Yi Shu LIU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to connect a UML with the host linux machine through tty and
> succeed, but then when I tried to boot another UML to play as the slave end,
> I failed. I hope some of you could give me some guide.
I recently wrote this
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:22:49PM -0700, wu answer wrote:
> But I found the "iomem" only get the first one parameter,that is
> "iomem=mmapper".The second parameter is lost.
How are you deciding that the second parameter is being lost?
Jeff
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:37:40PM +0200, Celso González wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:02:48AM -0700, Anthony Brock wrote:
> > Are you on the same network as the machine, or are you remote? If you're
> > remote, have you ensured that you're machines default route is still active
> > after y
Celso González wrote:
> 1. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promisc up
..
> 7. brctl addif uml-bridge eth0
These look good, but obviously you haven't added the UML TAP yet.
> The bridge it's up, but I lose all the conectivity in the machine even
> a single ping doesnt respond.
I am assuming here that you m
11 matches
Mail list logo