Re: [uml-user] user-mode-linux 2.4.27 -> 2.6.11 woes

2005-05-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 14 May 2005 02:00, Nix wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: > > On Friday 13 May 2005 23:18, Nix wrote: > >> Checking for /proc/mm...found > >> Checking for the skas3 patch in the host...found > >> [dead] > > > > add stderr=1 to make it more verbose. > Hm, nothing new

Re: [uml-user] user-mode-linux 2.4.27 -> 2.6.11 woes

2005-05-13 Thread Nix
On Sat, 14 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: > On Friday 13 May 2005 23:18, Nix wrote: >> Checking for /proc/mm...found >> Checking for the skas3 patch in the host...found >> [dead] > add stderr=1 to make it more verbose. Hm, nothing new appears. >> The crashing routine is (probably) init_regist

Re: [uml-user] user-mode-linux 2.4.27 -> 2.6.11 woes

2005-05-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 13 May 2005 23:18, Nix wrote: > So I'm trying to migrate from 2.4 to 2.6 across the board. I've been at > 2.6 everywhere but UML for some time, but this problem is defeating me. > > I'm running UML on a GCC-3.4.3-compiled 2.6.11.7-skas3-v8-rc5 host (to > be .9 when next I reboot) running

[uml-user] user-mode-linux 2.4.27 -> 2.6.11 woes

2005-05-13 Thread Nix
So I'm trying to migrate from 2.4 to 2.6 across the board. I've been at 2.6 everywhere but UML for some time, but this problem is defeating me. I'm running UML on a GCC-3.4.3-compiled 2.6.11.7-skas3-v8-rc5 host (to be .9 when next I reboot) running glibc-2.3.5, like this (simplified from longer li

Re: [uml-user] six UBD devices barrier at startup ??

2005-05-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 12 May 2005 19:09, Marcio Scheibler wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using UML for some months with good results. > > Now, I'm in trouble trying to start UML with seven UBD > devices... It recognizes just first six (ubda through ubdf) > regardless their order in command-line (even with > udb6

Re: [uml-user] six UBD devices barrier at startup ??

2005-05-13 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:02, Edward Faulkner wrote: > On 5/12/05, Marcio Scheibler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now, I'm in trouble trying to start UML with seven UBD > > devices... It recognizes just first six (ubda through ubdf) > > regardless their order in command-line (even with > > udb6s

Re: [uml-user] six UBD devices barrier at startup ??

2005-05-13 Thread Marcio Scheibler
I've traced kernel starting ddd/gdb and it seems to be parsing and consuming until eight ubd arguments as documented. Loading source for arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c, by tracing it, I see it feels ubd_dev array from index 0 to 7. Function ubd_setup_common is called for each argument being parsed. Fo

R: [uml-user] easiest distro to get UML running on

2005-05-13 Thread picinin
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data: May 12, 2005 5:16:38 PM A: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Ogg: [uml-user] easiest distro to get UML running on Sorry for sounding like a total newbie, but I'm doing a presentation on UML tonight for my LUG group, and while I have it running great on my des