[uml-user] UML/x86_64

2005-05-02 Thread Jeff Dike
I revived UML/x86_64 by fixing the bugs that had me stymied the last time I looked at it. It's not in mainline yet, but you can get a working UML by taking stock 2.6.12-rc3, and adding the incrementals up to and including skas0 (see http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html - you'll see a note t

Re: [uml-user] Debugging kernel: break on every instruction?

2005-05-02 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 02 May 2005 10:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I tried to use gdb on the kernel to analyze the TCP/IP stack. After the > first breakpoint I get a non-ending series of SIGTRAPs (I'm not sure > whether it's for every instruction or every line of code), which makes > debugging impossible. The

Re: [uml-user] stranger network problem

2005-05-02 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 29 April 2005 03:40, Jack wrote: > hi ,Blaisorblade > sorry to send this mail stright to you Sorry that I can't answer... sadly I'm no UML network expert, there are smarter people around on this subject... Maybe you can find them on the #uml IRC channel. Also there are various res

[uml-user] Debugging kernel: break on every instruction?

2005-05-02 Thread urs . hunkeler
I tried to use gdb on the kernel to analyze the TCP/IP stack. After the first breakpoint I get a non-ending series of SIGTRAPs (I'm not sure whether it's for every instruction or every line of code), which makes debugging impossible. The behaviour persists also after deleting all breakpoints (ie. I