On Monday 25 April 2005 10:31, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> Hi Paolo
>
> Thanks a lot for your response and suggestions! I think the handling of
> the fpx registers' absence is the key - see attached patch. But please
> read on...
>
> On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 17:12 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sun
Hi, I'm also fight with the "load-avg" issue. I found some mails
regarding this on the mailing list - here something from my side
about this...
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 Blaisorblade wrote:
The patch I suggested to Chris was named, in the patch,
"update-process-times", however the name in my tree wa
Hi Paolo
Thanks a lot for your response and suggestions! I think the handling of
the fpx registers' absence is the key - see attached patch. But please
read on...
On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 17:12 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2005 05:20, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> >
