Re: [uml-user] MySQL Sig-11

2005-04-14 Thread Tim Ansell
Hello, It turns out I'm a doofis. I moved /lib/tls to /lib/tls.old and now mysql starts fine! YAY! Any help with the kernel-panics would still be appreciated. Thanks for your help. Tim Ansell On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 14:15 +0930, Tim Ansell wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to run a LAMP (Linux,

[uml-user] MySQL Sig-11

2005-04-14 Thread Tim Ansell
Hello, I'm trying to run a LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) setup inside UML but I'm afraid I've become stuck. I'm running as a host kernel 2.4.27 kernel with the SKAS/SYSEMU patch from http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/ . vserver-host-1:/uml/scripts# cat /proc/version Linux version

Re: [uml-user] "stable" kernel ?!

2005-04-14 Thread Anthony Brock
>>> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/14/05 02:16PM >>> >On Tuesday 12 April 2005 19:42, Anthony Brock wrote: >> The most advanced, stable and mature UML kernel (IMHO) is a 2.6.10 (or >> newer) host kernel with v7 or newer of the SKAS patch. This host should be >> able to run >> almost any functi

Re: [uml-user] Re: [uml-devel] resizing root_fs

2005-04-14 Thread Frank Sorenson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Blaisorblade wrote: > On Wednesday 13 April 2005 06:07, itamar wrote: > >>dd if=/dev/zero of=root_fs.ext3 bs=1 count=1 seek=40G conv=notrunc > > Right enlarging command, it seems. > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] conacci]# resize2fs -p root_fs.ext3 >>resize2fs

[uml-user] tmpfs

2005-04-14 Thread itamar
It´s possible to use the same TMPDIR for all uml´s in the host ?mkdir /tmp/uml mount -t tmpfs -o mode=1777,size=512M none /tmp/uml TMPDIR=/tmp/uml linux mem=512M ... Itamar Reis Peixoto +55 (34) 3238 3845 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ispbrasil.com.br --

Re: [uml-user] Trying to bring up UML on 2.6.11 guest, 2.4.27 host

2005-04-14 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 14 April 2005 15:20, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 06:25:31PM +1200, Ian McDonald wrote: > > Aha - that is the solution to my problem on this machine - didn't > > realise that it was a kernel config option on 2.6.x and off by > > default. > > It's not off by default. Just

Re: [uml-user] "stable" kernel ?!

2005-04-14 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 19:42, Anthony Brock wrote: > Fabio, > > The most advanced, stable and mature UML kernel (IMHO) is a 2.6.10 (or > newer) host kernel with v7 or newer of the SKAS patch. This host should be > able to run > almost any functional UML host. You can download the SKAS patch from:

Re: [uml-user] Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.X)

2005-04-14 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 14 April 2005 20:36, Daniel Tombeil wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote: > > This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested > > turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that > > and reply to the list with th

[uml-user] Re: [uml-devel] resizing root_fs

2005-04-14 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 06:07, itamar wrote: > dd if=/dev/zero of=root_fs.ext3 bs=1 count=1 seek=40G conv=notrunc Right enlarging command, it seems. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] conacci]# resize2fs -p root_fs.ext3 > resize2fs 1.36 (05-Feb-2005) > resize2fs: File too large while trying to determine filesy

Re: [uml-user] Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.X)

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hello, On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote: > This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested > turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that > and reply to the list with the results? I now also tried 2.6.10 with the same result (1.0 Lo

Re: [uml-user] Booting UML on a disk partition of the host system?

2005-04-14 Thread Yannick Patois
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:46:35AM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote: >>I would like to boot UML on a real disk partition instead of a loopback >>mount on a file. This seems interesting to me because it doenst have the >>2Go lim

Re: [uml-user] Booting UML on a disk partition of the host system?

2005-04-14 Thread Milan P. Stanic
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:46:35AM +0200, Yannick Patois wrote: > I would like to boot UML on a real disk partition instead of a loopback > mount on a file. This seems interesting to me because it doenst have the > 2Go limit, and it looks simplier to configure. > > Is there a way to do it ? An ent

Re: [uml-user] Trying to bring up UML on 2.6.11 guest, 2.4.27 host

2005-04-14 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 06:25:31PM +1200, Ian McDonald wrote: > Aha - that is the solution to my problem on this machine - didn't > realise that it was a kernel config option on 2.6.x and off by > default. It's not off by default. Just if you don't copy arch/um/defconfig to .config before doing a

Re: [uml-user] Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.X)

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hello All, > On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote: > > This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested > > turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that > > and reply to the list with the results? > > sorry, just nuke my previous post :

[uml-user] Booting UML on a disk partition of the host system?

2005-04-14 Thread Yannick Patois
Hi, I'm very new to UML. I seeked the doc but couldnt found an answer to my question: I would like to boot UML on a real disk partition instead of a loopback mount on a file. This seems interesting to me because it doenst have the 2Go limit, and it looks simplier to configure. Is there a way to

Re: [uml-user] Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.X)

2005-04-14 Thread Dave Pearson
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote: > This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested > turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that > and reply to the list with the results? > > Regards, Peter > Thanks Peter Just tried # CONFIG_UM