On Saturday 09 April 2005 17:49, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Quoting Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Rather than use hostfs, I've been using NFS to mount my home on various
> > umls - it gives me more flexibility to move the uml to a machine with
> > more horsepower if I want to without shagging o
On Friday 08 April 2005 20:35, Gerald Richter wrote:
> > Going by memory, this was because earlier SYSEMU patches were
> > buggy. Recent UML refuse to run on earlier buggy SKAS patch
> > revision. Older ones seemed to run well, but crashed due to
> > the SYSEMU bug, for instance, when you did echo
On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:43, Jim Carter wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Scott Granados wrote:
> > Hi, I wonder if anyone has available any more current root images.
> > The ones on the uml site are helpful but out of date a bit.
> > I'd be interested possibly in new redhat or centos or slackware i
I've seen that the last week, the Wiki site was unavailable. I've been fearing
that it had been shut up for any bad reason (hardware problems, lost data,
anything).
So I've been asking again if it should (or not) be hosted on the main project
page (IIRC I already added the link).
I don't want
Dear UML developers,
I use UML for about two years, especially the version linux-2.4.24um-3
(uml-patch-2.4.24-3.bz2), and is quite stable.
Now I've compiled the last patch from SourceForge (uml-patch-2.4.27-1)
and sometimes (sporadically, maybe 1 out of 50 tries) my UMLs won't start.
Today I've
