On Friday 01 April 2005 20:14, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> Making root filesystems for UML to boot off of is a royal pain. I am
> surprised it has not gotten any easier. In the past I have installed an
> empty HD just like I wanted it and then copied the fs onto my uml host
> computer and it was a real t
Am 01.04.2005 um 21:03 schrieb Blaisorblade:
On Thursday 31 March 2005 00:37, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
Hi,
how to build cryptoloop support in 2.6.9-bs7 ?
Well, cryptoloop should work without problem, the right question is
for
aes-i586, right?
not completely, because: in menuconfig the cryptoloop opt
On Friday 01 April 2005 16:55, Hegedus Gabor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm running 10 uml's. Sometimes (about 1 mount) some (only one
> simultaneously) dieing without any message:
>
> I only see in the uml's syslog:
>
> courierpop3login: LOGOUT, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> ip=[:::194.149.39.44], top=0, retr=0
I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
(updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc).
I am now at a stage where I have linux-2.4.27 patched with
uml-2.4.27-bs2-pre7.patch and a
On Sunday 03 April 2005 20:40, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Yes, it's possible to do it. However, you should probably upgrade to
> > vanilla 2.6.11, either without any patch (UML has finally been merged) or
> > with the -bs1 tree on my homepage, see my signature (I should have
> >
On Friday 01 April 2005 18:44, Jim Carter wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Krisztian PIFKO wrote:
> > > WhatÂs is the best way to enable iptables on a guest machine ?
> >
> > the same like everywhere: have iptables support in the kernel and
> > tune it with the userspace utilities.
>
> Or compile iptab
Hey guys, just as an FYI, 2.6.9-skas3-v7 hosts running 2.6.9-bb4 guests
works very well with software suspend 2. After suspending my laptop and
then bringing it back online, my UML was still happily serving webpages.
Thought you might like to know.
--
Jason
When pigs fly, they fly first class
Dear UML developers,
I use UML for about two years, especially the version linux-2.4.24um-3
(uml-patch-2.4.24-3.bz2), and is quite stable.
Now I've compiled the last patch from SourceForge (uml-patch-2.4.27-1)
and sometimes (sporadically, maybe 1 out of 50 tries) my UMLs won't start.
Today I've poi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blaisorblade wrote:
> Yes, it's possible to do it. However, you should probably upgrade to vanilla
> 2.6.11, either without any patch (UML has finally been merged) or with the
> -bs1 tree on my homepage, see my signature (I should have uploaded it, I
[hmm, for some reason this didn't seem to pass through
gmane... resending directly]
I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
(updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc).
I am
On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
> UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc).
> I am now at a stage where I have
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Jim Carter spake:
> A maximally paranoid sysop will disable module loading, but this gives only
> a small benefit in security, because having done a root exploit the hacker
> can write nefarious code into /dev/kmem, as easily as he can load an
> inimical module or install a h
12 matches
Mail list logo
