On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Tracy R Reed wrote:
Making root filesystems for UML to boot off of is a royal pain. I am
surprised it has not gotten any easier. In the past I have installed an
empty HD just like I wanted it and then copied the fs onto my uml host
computer and it was a real time waster. It seem
On Friday 25 March 2005 14:38, Jonathan S. Romero wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to figure out what subsystem is causing kernel stack
> overflows. I attempted to apply the patch that baisorblade sent me, but
> I found that the current patchset I was using already had that
> particular change made.
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 02:00, Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I'm seeing a strange problem. I have a UML kernel that was compiled on
> a Red Hat 8.0 host system (kernel 2.4.18-19.8.0--I know, old eh? :-/).
Well,for the host kernel it's not a so big problem. Out-of-date UML instead
are much less
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Making root filesystems for UML to boot off of is a royal pain. I am
surprised it has not gotten any easier. In the past I have installed an
empty HD just like I wanted it and then copied the fs onto my uml host
computer and it was a real time waster.
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Krisztian PIFKO wrote:
> > What´s is the best way to enable iptables on a guest machine ?
> the same like everywhere: have iptables support in the kernel and
> tune it with the userspace utilities.
Or compile iptables and all the helper routines as modules, and install
those m
