On Thursday 24 March 2005 03:35, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Ok, I've put on the site the announcements of SKAS-v8 (which is identical
> to -rc5, I just need to update the tarballs), of the test tree (very test)
> for UML/2.4.
It does not compile with GCC 3.4, but from what I see no 2.4.27 tree will
com
Ok, I've put on the site the announcements of SKAS-v8 (which is identical to
-rc5, I just need to update the tarballs), of the test tree (very test) for
UML/2.4.
And, most important, of SKAS-v9-pre1 (for 2.6.11), which is the start towards
a SKAS version working on x86-64.
The code is there, i
I know that I dont have to worry about this messages, but I want to
remove them, just for beauty (-:
/sebastian
Blaisorblade schrieb:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 18:26, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
Daer uml-users,
during bootup I found the following in dmesg:
...
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDSIGACCEPT ca
The host replies that the db is inactive - can anyone fix this?
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedde
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 12:32, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:59:33PM +, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> > I'm observing strace(1) behaving oddly under recent 2.4.x
> > versions. Under 2.4.27 with uml-patch-2.4.27-1 and strace
> > 4.5.8, we get:
>
> [...]
>
> > Has anyone e
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 20:17, Jonathan S. Romero wrote:
> I am having problems with kernel stack overflow's on UML guests. Below
> is information surrounding the system causing the problems. I am
> basically looking to see if anyone notices anything blatently obvious
> about what's wrong here.
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 18:26, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
> Daer uml-users,
>
> during bootup I found the following in dmesg:
>
> ...
> line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDSIGACCEPT called
> ...
> line_ioctl: tty1: unknown ioctl: 0x4b50
> line_ioctl: tty1: unknown ioctl: 0x4b50
> ...
>
> who produces this ? Ho
Dear uml-users,
am using 2.6.11.2
thats what top shows if the machine is idle :
top - 21:46:57 up 4:39, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 0.97
Tasks: 24 total, 2 running, 22 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.4% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 0.0% wa, 99.6% hi, 0.0% si
why the
I am found a solution for my problem in this page
http://uml.pimb.org/howto/uml-debian-install.html#SWAP
You only need to run the following commands the first time you use a copy of
the installer. They are needed to configure the ubd device nodes correctly,
as the presupplied ones have got the wr
I am having problems with kernel stack overflow's on UML guests. Below
is information surrounding the system causing the problems. I am
basically looking to see if anyone notices anything blatently obvious
about what's wrong here. I might also switch to just plain 2.6.11 to
avoid any other extern
Daer uml-users,
during bootup I found the following in dmesg:
...
line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDSIGACCEPT called
...
line_ioctl: tty1: unknown ioctl: 0x4b50
line_ioctl: tty1: unknown ioctl: 0x4b50
...
who produces this ? How can I supress this ?
I already removed a couple of error messages that are uml
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 21:04, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Yes it is GCC specific but if you remove the double up of the enum
> define in sys_call_table.c it will work for ALL versions
Correct, just that 2.6.11 almost works for almost everyone. Actually the bug
you hit is not compilation-only, sadl
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Michael Foord wrote:
I'm looking for a low cost User Mode Linux hosting account. I have seen
the services at http://www.redwoodvirtual.com - they offer a $10 a
month account. I wondered if anyone has any experience of them - and
can recommend them (or otherwise!). Alternatively
On Monday 21 March 2005 23:46, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Sorry - should have said I documented the issues I found for 2.6.11 on
> the user-mode-linux-devel list not the user list - I find that really
> good for info about what runs where...
I'm not seeing your messages anywhere - can you recall what we
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:59:33PM +, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> I'm observing strace(1) behaving oddly under recent 2.4.x
> versions. Under 2.4.27 with uml-patch-2.4.27-1 and strace
> 4.5.8, we get:
[...]
> Has anyone else observed this and looked into it in more
> detail?
It looks as if th
I'm observing strace(1) behaving oddly under recent 2.4.x
versions. Under 2.4.27 with uml-patch-2.4.27-1 and strace
4.5.8, we get:
# strace /bin/echo
execve("/bin/echo", ["/bin/echo"], [/* 13 vars */]) = 0
exit_group(0) = ?
which isn't very useful.
Under 2.4.26 + uml-p
I am starting my guest machine with
ubd1=/uml/clau/swap.img
-bash-2.05b# swapon -aswapon:
/dev/ubd/1: No such device-bash-2.05b#
my fstab
/dev/ubd/0
/
ext3 defaults,usrquota 1
1/proc
/proc
proc
defaultsdevpts
/dev/pts de
On Monday 21 March 2005 04:06, Zev Benjamin wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been wrestling with getting UML to run under an installer
> (Linux/Athena), and I've run into some ubd naming issues. The installer
> looks at /proc/partitions to ensure that you've entered a valid
> partition name. Under a 2.6.10 UM
I'm looking for a low cost User Mode Linux hosting account. I have seen
the services at http://www.redwoodvirtual.com - they offer a $10 a
month account. I wondered if anyone has any experience of them - and
can recommend them (or otherwise!). Alternatively - suggestions of
similarly priced servic
19 matches
Mail list logo
