Re: [uml-user] kernel 2.6

2005-03-22 Thread Ian McDonald
Paolo, I appreciate all the work that you put in for making UML usable - it makes my life (and others I am sure) easier. Sames goes for work Jeff does. > With the patch above, I don't think it can compile (fstatfs64 is still > duplicated). > > Also, there are a bit of other problems (some not c

Re: [uml-user] kernel 2.6

2005-03-22 Thread Ian McDonald
Yes it is GCC specific but if you remove the double up of the enum define in sys_call_table.c it will work for ALL versions I presume you have read both things... e-mail below in case you haven't OK after much further investigation, redownloading of source (2.6.11.4) and looking at what

Re: [uml-user] kernel 2.6

2005-03-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 21 March 2005 23:46, Ian McDonald wrote: > Sorry - should have said I documented the issues I found for 2.6.11 on > the user-mode-linux-devel list not the user list - I find that really > good for info about what runs where... Sorry for my previous mail - I just found your report. Still,

Re: [uml-user] UML + RAID

2005-03-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 21 March 2005 20:13, M. Pilar Gonzalez Ferez wrote: > Hello, > > I have a RedHat 9.0 running in UML and I am trying to make a RAID-1 > with two files in a loop devices. (It's only for make practise > with RAID's). > > Can anybody tell me if it's posible to use RAID tools in UML? Yes, it