(Me Too ++: I'm running into the same issues with a non-nptl DB4 and rpm
on rhel4)
And making it even more interesting:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/release-notes/as-x86/
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 will no longer include support for
LinuxThreads. Therefore, applic
I would think that you would have better luck with FC3 and a
relatively new compiler.
I have tested 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 now on an older host kernel (and
published fixes for 2.6.11) so newers ones should be fine if not
you can read my posts as to how to fix 2.6.11. I will play with UML on
my FC3
Sorry - should have said I documented the issues I found for 2.6.11 on
the user-mode-linux-devel list not the user list - I find that really
good for info about what runs where...
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:45:31 +1200, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that you would have bette
Hello all,
I am running kernel 2.6.8 on FC3 and I am wondering which 2.6 kernels I
can run under user mode linux. Seems that some of them do not compile
from reading the mailing list. I am using gcc 3.3.4 and I have
installed the user mode linux utilities rpm from the website. Thanks, --
Jonathan
> I have a RedHat 9.0 running in UML and I am trying to make a RAID-1
> with two files in a loop devices. (It's only for make practise
> with RAID's).
>
> Can anybody tell me if it's posible to use RAID tools in UML?
> For the moment I didn't manage to do it.
Yup. I've done it -- LVM, RAID 1/5
This is a cross post to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
Dear lists,
Anybody successfully running cyrus-imapd in FC2/3+Xen/UML? When i tried
to run cyrus-imapd in a virtual FC3 (Xen or UML) i got lot's of
DBERROR db4: Berkeley DB library configured to support only
DB_PRIVATE environmen
Hello,
I have a RedHat 9.0 running in UML and I am trying to make a RAID-1
with two files in a loop devices. (It's only for make practise
with RAID's).
Can anybody tell me if it's posible to use RAID tools in UML?
For the moment I didn't manage to do it.
Thanks in advance
Pilar
--
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=c
Hi,
I am not able to exchange multicast packets between two UMLs using tuntap
transport type but it works for uml_switch daemon.
The steps followed are:
[host]#./linux umid=uml1 ubd0=Debian-3.0r0.ext2 init=/sh
eth0=tuntap,,,132.186.0.253 con=port:9977 con0=fd:0,fd:1
[host]#./linux umid=uml2 u
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not able to exchange multicast packets between two UMLs using tuntap
transport type but it works for uml_switch daemon.
The steps followed are:
[host]#./linux umid=uml1 ubd0=Debian-3.0r0.ext2 init=/sh
eth0=tuntap,,,132.186.0.253 con=port:9977 con0=fd:0,
10 matches
Mail list logo