Re: [uml-user] UML troubles: spawning thousands of processes

2005-03-08 Thread Jason Lunz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Try using the UML tree downloaded from my homepage (the -bs7 patchset against > 2.6.9) and it should solve the thousands of shells problem (it's normal they > are started, the problem is that don't die with SIGKILL, on those host kernel > versions). Is there any way ye

[uml-user] (probably) dumb question re: SKAS mode

2005-03-08 Thread Dave Pearson
Hi Are there any plans to get the SKAS patches merged into the kernel at some point? Although the current 'find a suitable skas patch at sourceforge/blaisorblade/tuxrocks' search when a new kernel comes out is charming, it would be even better if there was a 'SKAS Mode' checkbox in the vanilla ker

Re: [uml-user] UML troubles: spawning thousands of processes

2005-03-08 Thread nils toedtmann
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 06:30:55PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Thursday 03 March 2005 02:17, nils toedtmann wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:35:23PM -0800, Jim Carter wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Maarten wrote: > > > > Out of curiosity, is a 'default' SKAS-enabled guest (and without th