On Friday 04 February 2005 07:21, Zoltan NAGY wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
> >How about some more details?
>
> here it goes...
>
> the program I'm tring to debug is at http://nagyz.nefty.hu/uml/
> I start the guest:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/uml$ linux/vmlinux ubd0=root mem=256M con0=null,fd:2
> con1=fd:
Jeff Dike wrote:
How about some more details?
here it goes...
the program I'm tring to debug is at http://nagyz.nefty.hu/uml/
I start the guest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/uml$ linux/vmlinux ubd0=root mem=256M con0=null,fd:2
con1=fd:0,fd:1 eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.1.1
Checking for /proc/mm...found
Checki
On Saturday 29 January 2005 06:39, you wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > It's a huge work, but what is more important, it could obviously hurt
> > stability...
> Yes.
> > So, I'd suggest to follow this policy to choose the work to merge:
> >
> > - reduce *a lot* what is going to be merged... n
On Thursday 13 January 2005 19:28, Frank 'xraz' Fricke wrote:
> Hi List!
> I built UML from 2.6.10 sources with no additional uml-specific patches.
> My Host is also 2.6.10 with skas. I discovered that when (my) uml is
> running as root _every_ user-id inside the uml may chmod _every_ file on a
>
Did you set tightvnc up to use port 5900 as well?
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
I'm forwarding this to the list because I've not the time to look at every UML
user issue, and especially not now. I hope someone else can help you.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: RE: [uml-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Interesting, thanks. Unless i'm missing someething, this looks like
> its for a 2.6.x guest kernel only?
What you're missing is that I'm in the process of porting the 2.6 patches
back to 2.4, so this will show up there at some point.
Je
On Friday 04 February 2005 01:40, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 02/03/2005 06:48 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >>pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
> >>impliment it?
> >
> > See my incremental patches page -
> > http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
>
On 2005-02-02 19:22 -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:08:17PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
>
> > Would you rate hostfs as more or less secure than NFS ?
>
> Depends on your point of view, but I'd say hostfs is less secure. By
> definition, you're giving a UML process access
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I've been tring to use gdb within UML. Is it supported/possible?
Sure:
usermode:~# gdb getpid
GNU gdb 19990928
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribu
On 2005-02-03 21:46 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Saturday 29 January 2005 13:29, Andre Majorel wrote:
>
> > My UML's virtual consoles drop characters. If I connect to a UML
> > console (E.G. "screen /dev/pts/4") and cat a small file, parts of
> > it don't show. If I type too fast, some of the ke
On 02/03/2005 06:48 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
impliment it?
See my incremental patches page - http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
In short, it's a BlaisorBlade brainstorm (idea by him, implementation by me
an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
> impliment it?
See my incremental patches page - http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
In short, it's a BlaisorBlade brainstorm (idea by him, implementation by me
and Bodo) which gives you some of the
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I honestly didn't know that I could use the FC3 kernels for the host.
> > I had built my own vanilla 2.6.10 with the assorted 'bb' patches. Do
> > i need to rebuild the FC3 kernel RPM with UML patches applied, or does
> > the stand
Hello!
I've been tring to use gdb within UML. Is it supported/possible?
when I try I get this:
kernel BUG at mm/memory.c:891!
Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
EIP: 0073:[<4017e7ac>] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:b03c EFLAGS:
0293
Not tainted
EAX: ffda EBX: 0001 ECX: 0137 EDX:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I honestly didn't know that I could use the FC3 kernels for the host.
> I had built my own vanilla 2.6.10 with the assorted 'bb' patches. Do
> i need to rebuild the FC3 kernel RPM with UML patches applied, or does
> the standard FC3 kernel already have full SKAS support?
On Saturday 29 January 2005 13:29, Andre Majorel wrote:
> My UML's virtual consoles drop characters. If I connect to a UML
> console (E.G. "screen /dev/pts/4") and cat a small file, parts of
> it don't show. If I type too fast, some of the keystrokes are lost
> (or perhaps just not echoed, I'm not
On Thursday 03 February 2005 20:03, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it
> > > blows up almost immediately in the boot process with:
> >
> > I've had all sorts of problems with FC
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it
> > blows up almost immediately in the boot process with:
>
> I've had all sorts of problems with FC3 hosts (on x86_64, but it looks like
> i386 is just as broken).
On Sunday 30 January 2005 06:33, chill bill wrote:
> Hi:
> I'm really amazed by how to insmod my owen module with UML
> Now, I'm doing kernel programming about how to improve buddy=20
> Using UML-path-2.6.9-bb4 rootfs=3Droot_fs.fc2-pritstine-client
> So, the version about gcc, insmo
On Thursday 03 February 2005 18:21, Net Llama! wrote:
> I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it blows up
> almost immediately in the boot process with:
>
> Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...<0>
> Kernel panic:
> check_ptrace : expected SIGTRAP, got stat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it
> blows up almost immediately in the boot process with:
I've had all sorts of problems with FC3 hosts (on x86_64, but it looks like
i386 is just as broken). There was a 2.6.9 kernel that worked OK, and I
I'm forwarding this to the list because I've not the time to look at every UML
user issue, and especially not now. I hope someone else can help you.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: RE: [uml-devel] UML remote GUI problems
Date: Thursday 03 February 2005 20:24
From: Greg Furlong
I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it blows up
almost immediately in the boot process with:
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...<0>
Kernel panic:
check_ptrace : expected SIGTRAP, got status = 256
In idle task - not syncing
<6>SysRq : Show Regs
EIP: 0
Hello!
UML does not compile with 2.6.11-rc3...
need to add #include to ptrace.c, and need to comment
out some code to get it working..
any ideas?
Jeff? Blaisorblade?
Regards,
--
Zoltan NAGY,
Software Engineer
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
24 matches
Mail list logo