Btw, why don't you do the check on the host? Real probleems or will to do
it properly?
Thx for the answer, but i just klicked the wrong "newsgroup" in my
mozilla. The mail was ment to go to gentoo-user mailinglist.
About /forcefsck, maybe it ignores it if /halt or something like that is
absent
I was talking about a real system without UML, and the problem is, that
even with "mount -f -o remount,ro /" fsck.reiserfs still think that the
rootfs is mounted writable. I don't know why. mount shows "ro", but that
might not mean that much.
Check inside /proc/mounts, it's reliable (rootfs is alwa
Thanks Paolo.
i have done some testing & find out that command
uml_switch -unix /tmp/uml1 -tap tap10
doesn't work as i wrote earlier but if i use the command
uml_switch -tap tap10 -unix /tmp/uml1
it works fine. So may be the sequencing problem.
It resolves my problem that default socket file is no
On Thursday 13 January 2005 04:50, Sven Köhler wrote:
> > Btw, why don't you do the check on the host? Real probleems or will to do
> > it properly?
>
> Thx for the answer, but i just klicked the wrong "newsgroup" in my
> mozilla. The mail was ment to go to gentoo-user mailinglist.
About /forcefsck
Btw, why don't you do the check on the host? Real probleems or will to do it
properly?
Thx for the answer, but i just klicked the wrong "newsgroup" in my
mozilla. The mail was ment to go to gentoo-user mailinglist.
I was talking about a real system without UML, and the problem is, that
even wit
On Thursday 13 January 2005 04:28, Sven Köhler wrote:
> hi,
>
> it seems that the rootfs (a reiserfs) is damanged. I thought that i just
> have to create the file /forcefsck so that /etc/init.d/checkroot will
> run fsck on the filesystem, but the command that is executed is "fsck -C
> -a -f", but t
whoops, that mail was ment for the gentoo user mailinglist.
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.think
hi,
it seems that the rootfs (a reiserfs) is damanged. I thought that i just
have to create the file /forcefsck so that /etc/init.d/checkroot will
run fsck on the filesystem, but the command that is executed is "fsck -C
-a -f", but that command doesn't check the filesystem if it is a
reiserfs.
i'm curious: Why must one specify the host path for a hostfs mount via the
options string (mount's -o option)? Why hasn't that string been left free for
actual options (even if there aren't any yet)? Couldn't the host path be passed
in via whatever route mount's first positional parameter takes jus
I have set my UMLs up to have Control+Alt+Delete to be 'shutdown -h now'.
I then have a script that, when I exectute a shutdown, first does a
'uml_mconsole $UML' cad for every running guest and then waits for 60
seconds. After 60 seconds, it looks for any remaining running UMLs and,
if any rema
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 15:46, Hegedus Gabor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How stable is the ubd=mmap option? Can I use it on a real server?
No - that has been deprecated - in current UMLs it should even be removed.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 08:01, Dave Mielke wrote:
> I need the kernel symbol "memcpy" exported. Should I be doing that in
> "sys-i386/ksyms.c" or in "kernel/user_syms.c"?
Well, it works in both cases - the more logical place for it is
kernel/user_syms.c or (in recent 2.6) arch/um/os-Linux/use
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 19:56, Jeff Dike wrote:
> This patch fixes a long-standing problem in skas mode process creation.
So, probably, unless confirmed otherwise, the problem with CONFIG_KMOD (when
the kernel starts modprobe from a kernel thread) could be due to this bug...
however, I'm no
This patch fixes a long-standing problem in skas mode process creation. Chris
Aker has been seeing it at linode, and found a way of reproducing it. Once
I spotted the bug, I found an easier way:
ping flood the UML from the host while running
while true; do ls > /dev/null; done
In 10-15
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 06:10, Adil Mujeeb, Noida wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some questiosn related to uml switch
> 1. When we attach uml switch with tap device, what should be the command
> for it. I haev used:
>a) uml_switch -unix /tmp/uml1 -tap tap10
>But when we configure the device o
> I built my own uml kernel with the same config as the one that
is
> working, but still cannot bring up the network when using a
kernel I
> build myself. This means that I cannot turn off the CONFIG_UML_REAL_TIME_CLOCK
> and have a network. Everything else seems to be working. I
have tried
> t
Hi!
How stable is the ubd=mmap option? Can I use it on a real server?
thanks
HyGy
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:17:46PM +1300, Peter wrote:
> The command run when cad is hit is handled by /etc/inittab. Change the
> guest /etc/inittab entry for cad from shutdown -r (for reboot) to
> shutdown -h (for halt, rather than reboot).
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >What is the best way
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ( I have think about a mconsole with cad command but it reboot the
> guest .. i need a shutdown command )
What we do is that we make sure that /etc/inittab specifies that the
action for ctrl-alt-del is shutdown for each of the guests, and then
just use mconsole cad on t
Hi.
The command run when cad is hit is handled by /etc/inittab. Change the
guest /etc/inittab entry for cad from shutdown -r (for reboot) to
shutdown -h (for halt, rather than reboot).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i have Fedora core 2 Host ( 2.6.9 + skas3-v7 )
with many Guests ( Kernel 2.6.9 bb
Hi, i have Fedora core 2 Host ( 2.6.9 + skas3-v7 )
with many Guests ( Kernel 2.6.9 bb4 ).
What is the best way to do a mass shutdown of all
Guests?
I ask it because now i can't shut own my Host
server wthout
a mass corruption of Guests FS.
( I have think about a mconsole with cad command
Hi,
I have some questiosn related to uml switch
1. When we attach uml switch with tap device, what should be the command for
it. I haev used:
a) uml_switch -unix /tmp/uml1 -tap tap10
But when we configure the device of UML, its not working:
uml_mconsole umid configure eth0=daemon,,unix,/
gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-common -ffreestanding -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g -U__i386__
-Ui386 -D__arch_um__ -DSUBARCH=\"i386\" -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-Iarch/um/include -I/usr/src/linux-2.6.9-um/arch/um/kernel/tt/include
-I/usr/src/linux-2.6.9-um/arch/
The best host kernel is a 2.4 + SKAS3-v3, the best guest kernel is 2.6.9-bb4.
I've not tested plain 2.6.10 as guest, but nobody has yet done it, it seems!
I tested it.
I think that the best till now is host: 2.6.10 + skas3-v7, guest: 2.6.10
plain.
It works perfectly.
I am looking for a stable ke
24 matches
Mail list logo
