I promise I google'd first
I'm trying to use a multiple-select select box, for example:
One
Two
Three
Four
And I've tried backing my form bean with String[] AND with an
ArrayList.
When I try to use a String[] as the backing, the form displays, but
when I submit, I get an argument type mism
Not positive I completely understand the question, so I'll make a very
vague response.
You can:
1) Use the input attribute of an Action to specify the page that fed
it - if the validate() method on the ActionForm() returns a non-empty
ActionErrors, the user will go back there.
2) Specify a for
You have to do a couple of things:
1) While preparing the form, call generateToken(request);
2) Make sure you use the html:form tag - otherwise the token won't get
put on the page.
3) When the user submits, do two things
3a) Check isTokenValid(request) - if it is, contiue, if not, warn the
user.
ltiple="multiple" in the
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:54:05 -0600, Will Stranathan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I promise I google'd first
I'm trying to use a multiple-select select box, for example:
One
Two
Three
Four
And I've tried backing my form bean with String[] AND w
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:16:34 -0800
Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) Specify a for the Action that sends the user back
to
> from whence they came.
I don't think I can do this because they may come from a number of
pages.
You can specify a dynamic ActionForward return in your Actio
Browsers (AFAIK) don't send a request parameter with disabled radio
buttons. You'll have to do some additional checking in the reset()
method of your bean to set those to the proper values.
w
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:02:34 -0400
Néstor Boscán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I'm working with struts
Nope - Andrew is right - JSP's are only part of the configuation and
support files in a well-written MVC webapp - it's only TEMPLATE text.
Just like if you send a canned email, I'm sure you keep your email
templates under WEB-INF, right? Well, JSP's are just out.println()
template.
w
On Thu,
Hello again,
I've found this interesting and seemingly useful piece of information
in a struts book I recently obtained.
Dynamic Forwards
ActionForward forward = new
ActionForward("/do/itemEdit?action=edit");
Then it goes on to tell me to use the runtime parameter techniques in
the previous s
Just include a hidden element with the token name and value. Like:
You'll have to look in the session to get the token value. I *think*
the session key this is under is org.apache.struts.action.TOKEN
(looking at the javadoc for that).
w
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:21:44 +0800
Anthony Hong <[EMAI
You have to configure the underlying logging package - such as Log4j
if you're using that or Java 1.4 logging if you're using that.
w
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:02:39 -0500
Alex Kravets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Couple of question about logging in Struts.
I included commons-logging.jar in my classp
Not to show how terribly behind the times I am, but isn't that
precisely one of the things Axis does? You pop a war file into your
container, add your existing business code, and voila, standard java
methods are exposed as web services?
Not saying your plans won't cure cancer, but are you rein
Does anybody have a good example of an ActionForm/ combo that works? I've been banging my head against
a wall for a week now trying to figure out what the issue is. With
tracing turned on, the Struts RequestProcessor IS receiving a
String[], but when BeanUtils attempts to call the setters in m
I had posted earlier concerning this, and haven't gotten any response,
but I think it got lost in all the spirited discussions about
constants interfaces, leadership voting, etc. over the past week.
I've done a lot of searching, and AFAICT, I'm trying all the right
things, but it's still not wo
THANKS! After all that work, I *think* BeanUtils was having issues
with setNumber(int, String) for some reason - when I took out the
setters for indexed values, and just have setters/getters for the
arrays - it works like a champ!
Thanks a TON!
Will Stranathan
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:16:55
Well, I understand the way HTTP is working there, it just SEEMS to be
that having the additional method (setBar(int, String)) confused
BeanUtils or something - because removing those methods (making no
other changes) cleared the problem up.
w
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:15:01 -0500
Jeff Beal <[EMAI
Fantastic! That's exactly what I was looking for! And since I've got
so much stuff in the form bean, I can just access the stuff directly
from the form bean. (I know it's not the RIGHT way to do it, but with
as many attributes as there are to this, it'd be nice to not have to
rewrite existin
That code is being put in because you set the focus attribute of the
html:form tag, but there is no attribute called username.
w
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:20:36 -0500
"Nadia Kunkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this question is really about struts even though it
occures in my str
Which was one thing I had already done - didn't use comments, but did
all my up-front work in one line.
w
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:32:41 -0500
Kris Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the paranoid, you probably want to be sure that the email
template
("EmailTestTemplate.jsp") doesn't actuall
Could you show us the relevant parts of your config? And anything in
the logs?
What I typically do is rather than redirect, make a DownloadAction and
put any downloadables under /WEB-INF (or in a database or somewhere)
so that the user can't type in a URL to do directly do it. Then, just
mak
While the token is ALSO used for double submit protection, it also
validates that the user got to your form the right way.
i.e., if they don't go to page A and submit, their token won't be
valid.
w
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:28:49 -0500
"ckl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have read two books (Strut
In the JSP that you .include - - creates
a string called emailStuff, whose content is everything that gets
evaluated inside the tag.
Personally, I REALLY like the HttpServletResponseWrapper approach
better - MUCH more elegant, and looks like less of a hack.
w
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:23:49 -05
Yes - there is that possibility.
w
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:58:23 -0500
"ckl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting ... Does the following use case break this?
If a malicious user goes to page A and submits, gets page B with a
valid
token as a hidden form field. They then try to submit this valid
This seems to come up frequently. You have to add some Javascript on
the client side to either populate hidden form fields or to iterate
through the entire target set and select them all - the values don't
get passed in the HTTP request unless it's selected.
w
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:01:19 +053
Or, keep all your static shared junk in your initializer class, then
make the mutator private, accessor public.
w
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:29:53 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, as another poster said, why not just set the value in a
static initializer block, and only expose a getter
If I remember the same thread, I think the thrust of the argument was
that JSP belongs under WEB-INF because it's TEMPLATE artifacts, NOT
web artifacts. However, images and javascripts, unless you have a
custom servlet or Struts action to retrieve those artifacts, would NOT
belong under WEB-IN
25 matches
Mail list logo
