http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/taglibs/standard-1.0/source/
The link to the Archives is available from the bottom of the Jakarta
download page (http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi). Look for
"The Apache Archives".
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Derek Richardson [
This article http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Unicode.html
provides a good introduction to character encodings. It may help.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Christina Siena [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: June 29, 2004 5:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: how to handle sp
Only for those with deep pockets, but WebSphere Studio's struts-config
editor will automatically create an Action class from an action-mapping
definition at the click of a button.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: July 8, 2004 3:06 PM
> To: S
Michael,
Could you expand on your performance tests? What kind of response time
improvements (seconds, milliseconds?) were you seeing?
In my experience, the performance impact of the existing dispatch actions is
not readily visible so I'm not sure how optimizing them would help in a
real-world si
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McGrady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: March 27, 2004 6:42 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat -- JSP -- KeyPairGenerator -- Security Exception
>
>
> I have downloaded 1.4.2 and have the same exact problem. Somehow it
> refuses
Also, perhaps the question you should be asking is, "How can *I* help
speed things up?"
Here's a couple of ideas:
- Try out the Stuts 1.2.0 release and report back any problems, or
(hopefully) report how stable and reliable it is for your applications.
- Get the source code and try applying some
p.s. The fact that you're hassling us for a release in IMHO, A Good
Thing (tm). It's when nobody cares anymore, that I'll get worried :-)
Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
There's some info on post-1.1 changes here:
http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html#New
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: ganesh g [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: April 23, 2004 11:18 PM
> To: user
> Subject: Differences Between Struts1.1 and Struts1.2
>
>
> Hi List,
>
Don't worry, I didn't take your comments in a negative way.
It is worth listening to what's happening on the dev list, then you'll
know as much as anyone what's happening. There are no offline
discussions, everything happens in public, via the dev-list.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From:
Michael / Jack / Thingamabob,
Struts is licensed in such a way that if you are unhappy with the way it
is being managed, you are quite free to fork the code and continue to
develop it in whatever way *you* see fit.
I suspect you'd make a lot of people very happy if you went away and did
that
Simon, I think you've nicely illustrated the problem. Rather than
interpret what people have said as their honest,educated opinion,
certain people choose to interpret it as bullshit. Some people can live
in a world that has many "right" answers, others see only in black and
white.
The irony h
Frank, I don't think Java Web Parts should provide support for Ajax.
After all, this is *Java* Web Parts and Ajax has nothing to do with
Java. Anyway, Ajax is just a fad and I don't like it. If you want to do
Ajax, you should split it off into a separate project.
Give me commit rights and I'll
be
prevented from using and modifying it as you see fit. Even starting a
new project if that's what you want.
One final thought. If the committers have a responsibility to the
community, what is the community responsibility to the committers?
Steve
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Fri,
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I was *going* to say that the difference is that when the project
started it was me and me alone, and that isn't the case any more.
There are two other committers, and we have project bylaws that
effectively gives them the ability to do things even if I 100%
disagree.
uld become Struts 2.0 is not a huge proof that
everything you just said is not goofy? Maybe we could suggest that
Java become C?
On 3/17/06, Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
I was *going* to say that the difference is that when the project
started
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
That's certainly one interpretation. For me, the responsibility comes
with the position by default.
...
What responsibilities do I have to my elected officials?
This might be getting to the heart of why we see the responsibilities
differently. The committers are not e
I think the flaw in my analogy is that nobody will starve if they choose
not to eat at the Struts shelter :-)
Steve
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Steve Raeburn wrote:
Let me try another analogy. Let's say you go down to volunteer at a
homeless shelter. You serve a few meals and wipe a few t
I have an idea. Why don't we publish the source code to Struts so that
absolutely anyone can contribute to the project. You are right that
we'll need a review process for all those contributions. So why don't we
require all incoming code to be reviewed by at least one experienced
developer befo
athan Revusky wrote:
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I have an idea. Why don't we publish the source code to Struts so
that absolutely anyone can contribute to the project. You are right
that we'll need a review process for all those contributions. So why
don't we require all incoming code
e about to be mentioned for an honorarium
in computer history.
On 3/24/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Raeburn wrote:
Bottom line is that this is the way Apache works and it's not going to
change.
In any case, it is not a subject of legitimate debate
Here's *one* way to achieve what you're after:
[left]
[right]
link1
link2
Courtesy of Eric Meyer
http://www.complexspiral.com/publications/containing-floats/
All that's different to your first example is the addition of an
additional 'float' on the outer div. This causes it to expand
21 matches
Mail list logo
