I've been totally defeated in my attempt to alter an html:text
element inside a logic:iterate tag. There must be a way to
accomplish this, but I've been beating my head against the wall
for three days now without making progress.
I have simplified the problem substantially from the initial page.
On Friday 13 August 2004 09:40, Richard Yee wrote:
> Mike,
> What does the generated HTML look like?
The generated HTML is not the problem; the failure to invoke the set method is
the problem. However, maybe looking at it would provide some insight into
the cause. Anyway, here it is:
On Friday 13 August 2004 09:43, Brian Lee wrote:
> Lists work, but you have to write your own set(int index) method to set the
> correct object from the List.
>
> BAL
I still believe that lists work -- it's not lack of belief that's the problem,
it's lack of results. There's some magic involved
On Friday 13 August 2004 09:40, Jim Barrows wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Elliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 9:33 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Read only iterate?
> >
> >
> > I&#x
re in the discussion do the authors drop the bomb that using indexed
tags makes the whole situation read-only and I still think that there must be
some way to make it work using indexed tags -- I just haven't yet found it.
However, thanks for pointing me at the earlier solution -- it does wo
nds as &,
left angle brackets as < etc.?
--
Mike Elliott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have an application which gathers information about internal
processes. Some of this information is in the form of a text file, an
Excel file, a PDF file, etc.
What I need to be able to do is to make a URL available to users which
will provide a requested file to a user; that is, if the URL ref
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 19:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since the posting I made a happy discovery though. If I save an optional
> date with the value '01-01-0001' (d-m-y), it appears as blank when
> displayed - just what I was after.
Are you sure? Isn't it m-d-y?
---
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 19:49, Joe Hertz wrote:
> Absolutely. You have access to all of the response object methods you would
> in a servlet to do this with.
>
> Set the correct content type and content length headers and spit it to the
> outputstream. Return a null findForward.
>
> I've done this
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:31:47 -0400, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course if you have millions of users that
> might be another story.
Millions of users, each of whom have an active session. Otherwise,
who cares how many rows are in the database? Certainly not struts.
-
I have a neglected Ultra 1, now running Solaris 9, which I've rescued
to use as a web application server. It's running JBoss just fine and
when my web application is loaded and run the response time, while
slow (on the order of a second or two per page) is still reasonable.
The problem comes abou
I have a situation where the form bean contains objects inside it
which represent sets of things which will appear in an
tag. In particular, the objects have three properties:
selected_ndx
ndx_set
label_set
One of these objects is the 'moderator' property of the form bean.
The overall design i
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:38:36 -0500, Jason King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a javascript problem. The DOM-compliant way to change the
> selected option for a element is:
> .selectedIndex = for your example that
> would be:
>
> opener.document.formBean.selectElementName.selectedIndex = ;
> Try opener.document.formBean["moderator.selected_ndx"] The arrays are
> also hashtables.
Yes, that works. Thanks a bunch. Although I still think that the
bean approach *should* have worked -- it doesn't. And I'll gladly
settle for this workaround.
---
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 19:46:46 -0400, David G. Friedman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm starting to severly dislike this error message from some unknown subscribe
> at standarbank.co.az.
Actually its standardbank.co.za (South Africa). I'm getting them too.
I assume everyone is.
On 7/13/05, Jörg Eichhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for the hint and example. I've choosen the nested way to do this,
> because i
> think this makes the jsp code more readable.
>
> I there a way to do the same using request scope?
> When i do this i get an exception because the collecti
> Well I could see for large forms with nested data it might not be a
> great idea to keep these around in the Session. I 'try' to stick to
> using the Request when I can but I don't bend over backwards like
> some do on this list to avoid the Session.. I'm in "The Session is your
> friend" ca
On 7/18/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still not totally clear where the problem is, since I'm not sure
> what Session has to do with the initial setup of the form.
The difference is unobvious, I admit, but this is what I was thinking
of: If I use a session bean, I can do some
I'm trying to build an application where:
1) p1.jsp transitions via a link: /do/Something?action=initialize.
2) This causes class app.SelectionAction to have its execute() method invoked.
3) The execute() method, based on the parameter, initializes the form passed it.
4) The execute() method th
;=== should be scope="session"
> validate="false"
> >
>
>
>
>
> On 4/27/05, Mike Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to build an application where:
> >
> > 1) p1.jsp transitions via a link: /do/Something?actio
On 4/27/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> scope="request" <=== should be scope="session"
Thanks! I knew it had to be something simple like that! And I've
wasted a day and a half finding it.
-
On 5/23/06, temp temp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Web services. How web services are written in java. Are there any
tutorials to understand the concept of web services?
What particular kind of a web service did you have in mind? You
mentioned Enterprise Java Beans. Those are not a web s
22 matches
Mail list logo
