On 3/19/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have expressed my "technical concerns" more than once. I have even had
> Craig agree with them, in a sense. JSF is built for those who are
> technically challenged and for tools. I don't think even Craig thinks that
> JSF is superior as a pr
On 3/20/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might be interested in the bylaws I wrote for Java Web Parts:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/docman/?group_id=140728
>
> Most importantly in the context of this discussion is the fact that
> ANYONE who contributes AT ALL can vote and HAVE T
On 3/22/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to point out that communities and PMCs in Apache decidedly do
> NOT have a one-to-one mapping.
If you dig into them though, they're changing.
Web Services is flattening, XML is federating, I'm being a pain at
Jakarta trying to get
On 3/22/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > foo.apache.org maps to a PMC, which maps to a coding community, not to
> > a codebase.
>
> Henri, I feel I should give you a bit of end-user feedback. I am not
> active in any
On 3/22/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/22/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/23/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Struts is a cool community. The users are actively involved, in terms
&g
On 3/23/06, Emmanouil Batsis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As a mortal user i would suggest that all this discussion to be taken
> somewhere else, but i have a strong feeling that the motives behind this
> and many other thread posts during the last few months are actually fed
> by the
On 3/27/06, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lighten up. I wrote it. It was supposed to be joke to bring levity to an
> incredibly annoying situation. If I wrote actually trying to be you and
> truly impersonate you, that would be a different matter. If I wanted to
> really spoof being you
On 3/28/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Not a very impressive joke. This was a major breach of manners 10
> > years ago, and it still is today.
> >
>
> I thought they were funny 10 years ago, too, especially when it was
>
On 3/28/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On 3/28/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Henri Yandell wrote:
> >>
> >>>Not a very impressive joke. This was a major breach of manners 1
Before I sit and churn through compiling and testing, does anyone know
of any blatant reasons why the Struts 1.2.x release couldn't be using
the latest FileUpload and Validator with all the bugfixes?
(is there a convention for the [xx] part of the subject when talking
about 1.2.x?)
Hen
-
I've always thought I had a Gandhi complex, not a God one.
*Sits in the road and hums until people are nice to each other and
other such things that only happen in cartoons for 5 year olds - like
talking goldfish*
Hen
On 3/28/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for this decisi
The registration system at InfoQ is pretty slow; so I downloaded
directly from lulu.com.
Great work Ian, I hope it becomes the 'Thinking in Struts2' and is a
big success.
Hen
On 5/25/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble logging into the InfoQ site?
On 5/24/0
Not that I've tested at all - but I suspect it works ok.
Hen
On 4/20/07, Crawford, Preston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone know?
Preston
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Preston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 6:39 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subjec
Does anybody have any thoughts on whether somebody starting a new
project should use WebWork or Struts 1.x? Any feel for what the
upgrade pain will be from each one to Struts 2.0?
From what I understand, WW is going to be the much simpler upgrade,
but I'm wondering how simple. Also how is the W
14 matches
Mail list logo
