Struts2's Injection based on JSR 330

2010-08-01 Thread Frans Thamura
anyone using this code.google.com/p/atinject/ any idea to change the Spring/XWork IoC with this so we have standard injection -- Frans Thamura Meruvian. We grow because we share the same believe. Mobile: +6287885901958 Blog & Profile: http://frans.thamura.info We provide services to migrate

Re: Struts2's Injection based on JSR 330

2010-08-01 Thread Frans Thamura
done https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3474 but still seeking a way to use the @Services and @transactional in javax.inject F On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Frans, this is a good idea. Do you want to open a JIRA ticket and officially > recommend this? > > PS: T

No result defined for action ........ and result input

2010-08-01 Thread Chris Miles
Hi folks. I am getting the following exception on my action method. No result defined for action and result input But my action method is annotated with @SkipValidation so I do not know why it is firing this error. Chris

Re: No result defined for action ........ and result input

2010-08-01 Thread Cimballi
It's highly probable that at some moment in the action process you (or the framework) return "input" as the result. Cimballi On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Chris Miles wrote: > Hi folks. > > I am getting the following exception on my action method. > > No result defined for action and

Re: No result defined for action ........ and result input

2010-08-01 Thread Chris Miles
Hi, It is not being returned by me so without having to debug the source is anything which might be triggering it? thanks Chris - Original Message - From: "Cimballi" To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 9:36 PM Subject: Re: No result defined for action

Re: No result defined for action ........ and result input

2010-08-01 Thread Cimballi
As a first step you can try to activate the logs for Struts and Xwork and look if they say anything when returning from the action. Cimballi On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Chris Miles wrote: > Hi, It is not being returned by me so without having to debug the source is > anything which might be