No problem! Thanks for conformation!
2013/12/16 Yasser Zamani :
> I could not re-produce it with most recent version, 2.3.16. Both DTD
> versions work correctly on an off-line Tomcat :)
>
> I think there is a mis-version-configuration between struts and xwork with
> that non-maven old application.
I could not re-produce it with most recent version, 2.3.16. Both DTD
versions work correctly on an off-line Tomcat :)
I think there is a mis-version-configuration between struts and xwork
with that non-maven old application. Sorry for the inconvenience!
Thanks!
On 12/15/2013 03:53 PM, Lukasz
Hmm... so it must be some small bug, a typo somewhere. Can you
register an issue with the stacktrace and explanation that it works
with 1.0.2?
Thanks
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
2013/12/15 Yasser Zamani :
> I reviewed Struts internally and discovered that in all places
I reviewed Struts internally and discovered that in all places it uses
"1.0.2" instead of "1.0.3". So, I guessed if I rewrite my DOCTYPE to:
1.0.2//EN" "http://struts.apache.org/dtds/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";>
it may work. I tried and yeah, it works!
(However, it's some was confusing that
2013/12/14 Yasser Zamani :
> Hi there,
>
> We have a Struts2 application with some validation XMLs with following
> "DOCTYPE":
>
>1.0.3//EN" "http://struts.apache.org/dtds/xwork-validator-1.0.3.dtd";>
>
>
> When we run this application on a server which has access to
> "struts.apache.org",
Hi there,
We have a Struts2 application with some validation XMLs with following
"DOCTYPE":
http://struts.apache.org/dtds/xwork-validator-1.0.3.dtd";>
When we run this application on a server which has access to
"struts.apache.org", there is no problem. But when we run it on a server
wh
6 matches
Mail list logo
