for
>> > includeParams?
>> > MG>
>> >> (You could use tags but for the links I find the less
>> >> verbose
>> >> JSTL expressions to be prettier.)
>> >>
>> >> The other type of urls you can put in there are things like home,
>> images,
>> >> st
any attachments relates to the official business
of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not
endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does
not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Sat, 14 Ma
ry Martin, did Dave answer your question? Were you just wondering
>> >> about
>> >> the namespace parameter on the url tag or about the routes pattern in
>> >> general?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> mgainty wrote:
>> >> >
>> &
27;routes pattern'
> >
> > thanks,
> > Martin
> > __
> > Disclaimer and confidentiality note
> > Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official
> > business of Sender. This transmiss
anks,
> > Martin
> > __
> > Disclaimer and confidentiality note
> > Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official
> > business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and
> > Sender does not
on is of a confidential nature and
> Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended
> recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within
> this transmission.
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:23:57 -0700
>> From: d
> > this transmission.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:24:54 -0700
> >> From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
> >> To: user@struts.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: this is driving me nucking futs!
> >>
>
tion to any party other than intended
> recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within
> this transmission.
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:24:54 -0700
>> From: dustin_pea...@yahoo.com
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> S
Martin Gainty wrote:
can you explain this routes a bit more..what is this another attribute or a
template?
i can see see action, params but namespace?
Yeah, so if the action is in another namespace you can refer to it.
if you look at the code the base class changes from
public class AnchorTa
I'm a tool.
> >
> > I'm not *entirely* sure they're being complimentary ;)
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> > For additional co
rely* sure they're being complimentary ;)
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> -----------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apac
---
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/this-is-driving-me-nucking-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/this-is-driving-me-nucking-
mitch gorman wrote:
I AM AN INSTRUMENT OF CHANGE!!!
Hmm, when people say that about me they say I'm a tool.
I'm not *entirely* sure they're being complimentary ;)
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.a
contained within this transmission.
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:17:13 -0400
> From: mgor...@shadowtv.biz
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: Re: this is driving me nucking futs!
>
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > That is something I have com
my list of annoyances:
1. iterator tag no having "begin" and "end"
2. "a" not able to build a url
3. "validateAnnotatedMethodOnly" in "validation" interceptor should be
"true" by default
first one is down, I gotta tackle the other 2.
musachy
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jim Kiley wrote:
>
Musachy, I would refer to you as "a cool dude" if you did that.
jk
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> That is something I have complained about for a long time, time to do
> something about it I guess.
>
> musachy
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Chris Pratt
> wrote:
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> That is something I have complained about for a long time, time to do
> something about it I guess.
>
I AM AN INSTRUMENT OF CHANGE!!!
;)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.
That is something I have complained about for a long time, time to do
something about it I guess.
musachy
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Chris Pratt wrote:
> I guess one question I would ask is why doesn't have an action
> paramter and allow nested elements? That way there would be no
> nee
I guess one question I would ask is why doesn't have an action
paramter and allow nested elements? That way there would be no
need to create any variables.
(*Chris*)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:56 PM, mitch gorman wrote:
> Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, mitch gorm
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, mitch gorman wrote:
>
>>thanks for your responses, wes!
>>
>>
>
> No problem, next time, include me in your list of gurus and I'll be happy
lol! you got it!
(i knew for sure i was probably inadvertently dissing at lea
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> yeah, the for loop is just to illustrate the point. The #context
> thingie will work in any version
okay, well, as i just noted in my response to wes, i clearly
must've boneheaded something else when i tried it the first time,
because the simple, un-overthought appro
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, mitch gorman wrote:
>
> thanks for your responses, wes!
>
No problem, next time, include me in your list of gurus and I'll be happy.
-Wes
--
Wes Wannemacher
Author - Struts 2 In Practice
Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, mitch gorman wrote:
>
>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
>>>
>>> >> >>
>>>
>>this was the very first thing i attempted... it was the logical
>> firs
yeah, the for loop is just to illustrate the point. The #context
thingie will work in any version.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, mitch gorman wrote:
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>> Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
>>
>> > >
> this was the very first thi
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, mitch gorman wrote:
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>> Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
>>
>> > >
> this was the very first thing i attempted... it was the logical
> first attempt. unfortunately, what i ended up with when i di
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> It seems like you are created a variable variable name... I am
> assuming that there is a reason why you are using and wanting
> to refer to the constructed URL by id, rather than just doing the
> following -
>
>
>
>">blah
>
> In an iterator, rather than
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
>
>
this was the very first thing i attempted... it was the logical
first attempt. unfortunately, what i ended up with when i did that was
a set of links to the last loop iteration's URL.
Ok, first, you don't need to define variable for each url, you can just do
somelink
musachy
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, mitch gorman wrote:
> okay, can anyone (musachy, david, martin, i'm looking in your
> direction!) tell me how to do what i'm trying to do, here?
It seems like you are created a variable variable name... I am
assuming that there is a reason why you are using and wanting
to refer to the constructed URL by id, rather than just doing the
following -
">blah
In an iterator, rather than constructing a name and trying to use OG
mitch gorman wrote:
> okay, can anyone (musachy, david, martin, i'm looking in your
> direction!) tell me how to do what i'm trying to do, here?
>
> i've got a list of items i'm iterating over. for each item, i want
> to have one or more links to actions, with parameterization from the
> i
okay, can anyone (musachy, david, martin, i'm looking in your
direction!) tell me how to do what i'm trying to do, here?
i've got a list of items i'm iterating over. for each item, i want
to have one or more links to actions, with parameterization from the
item's data. this means, using
32 matches
Mail list logo
