Re: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-22 Thread Mike Darretta
I performed a quick tweak of the JSP, but still get the same error. After more inspection, though, I think your assessment is on target. There are a handful of places where the accessor methods are overloaded (needlessly), and they typically correspond to my problem properties. I will need to d

Re: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-22 Thread Mike Darretta
Andrew, BINGO! I looked back, and indeed, the property in question has multiple getters/setters. I'm going to modify the names of the extraneous getters/setters and see if this makes a difference. Thanks for the tip! Mike Andrew Hill wrote: Ive not seen your code so Ive no idea if this is what y

Re: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-21 Thread Andrew Hill
Ive not seen your code so Ive no idea if this is what you are doing (probably not from the sound of it), but its been my experience that when I dont quite follow the bean specs for my getters and setters it still sometimes works... until I change something else like my JVM version or add some o

Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-21 Thread Mike Darretta
Has anyone else experienced any issues with Struts (current release) and JDK 1.4.2_06? I have found my second 'oddity' with JDK release 06. My previous post showed that a form property named "currentView" caused the infamous "no getter method for property ..." error. When I changed the property

Re: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-18 Thread Sébastien GALLET
Mike Darretta a écrit : I encountered a strange issue that may be relevant to others After upgrading our JDK from 1.4.2_05 to 1.4.2_06, many of our struts actions reported the following error: Got the same problem when update tomcat and jdk (don't know which causes troubles). "No getter m

Re: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-17 Thread Mike Darretta
riginal Message- From: Jim Barrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 12:39 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06 Sounds like one for sun, and of course let us know. That's really weird. -Original Message- From: Mike Darr

RE: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-17 Thread Mick.Knutson
reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -Original Message- From: Jim Barrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 12:39 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06 Sounds like one fo

RE: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-17 Thread Jim Barrows
Sounds like one for sun, and of course let us know. That's really weird. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Darretta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:16 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06 > &

Re: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-17 Thread Mike Darretta
I did a clean build, recompile, etc. Note that I am able to go back to the previous name "currentView", cause the exception, then rename the property and things would work just fine. Mike Durham David R Jr Contr 805 CSPTS/SCE wrote: Are there any thoughts on how a form bean property name could c

AW: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-17 Thread Leon Rosenberg
Have you made a clean build? Deleted the work directory of the jsp-container? > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Mike Darretta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Dezember 2004 20:21 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06 > > I

AW: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-17 Thread Leon Rosenberg
Have you made a clean build? Deleted the work directory of the jsp-container? > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Mike Darretta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Dezember 2004 20:21 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06 > > I

RE: Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-17 Thread Durham David R Jr Contr 805 CSPTS/SCE
> Are there any thoughts on how a form bean property name could conflict > with a JDK release? Did you recompile the entire project with the new JDK? I wouldn't think that should matter, but perhaps it does in your case. - To u

Struts and JDK 1.4.2_06

2004-12-17 Thread Mike Darretta
I encountered a strange issue that may be relevant to others After upgrading our JDK from 1.4.2_05 to 1.4.2_06, many of our struts actions reported the following error: "No getter method for property currentView of bean pagingListForm" I upgraded all our apache-related jars to the most rec

Re: struts and jdk

2004-10-20 Thread James Mitchell
ent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 8:44 AM Subject: struts and jdk Can I use jdk1.4 with struts 1.1? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional co

Re: struts and jdk

2004-10-20 Thread Luis Gervaso
yes On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:59:56 -0400, Jeff Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see why not. > > > > Viral_Thakkar wrote: > > Can I use jdk1.4 with struts 1.1? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For ad

Re: struts and jdk

2004-10-20 Thread Jeff Beal
I don't see why not. Viral_Thakkar wrote: Can I use jdk1.4 with struts 1.1? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

struts and jdk

2004-10-20 Thread Viral_Thakkar
Can I use jdk1.4 with struts 1.1? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]