Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Yahoo.. This is working. when i change the param name "expression" to "regex" as you suggested it is working. Thank you so much. Finally got it On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Chris Pratt wrote: > Try: > > [^<>]+ > > (*Chris*) > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Mural

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Yes I did. Not only this to that matter a simple reg which is shown in docs also did not work. so i concluded that validator itself is not working. I dont know why? On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Chris Pratt wrote: > Muralindhar, > I just realized I forgot the + from your original regex. Di

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Chris Pratt
Try: [^<>]+ (*Chris*) On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < java.yaraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is how i did > > http://struts.apache.org/dtds/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> > > > > > The value of bar2 must be in the format > w

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Chris Pratt
Muralindhar, I just realized I forgot the + from your original regex. Did you try my regex as is or did you fix it like "[<>]+" ? (*Chris*) On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < java.yaraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, I tried with the regex that you suggested but it did

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
This is how i did http://struts.apache.org/dtds/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> The value of bar2 must be in the format where x and y are between 0 and 9 Almost I have tried all the suggested combination by the members. It did not work. On Wed, Mar 20,

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Dave Newton : > This is fun. don't push ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@st

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Dave Newton
This is fun. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > are u asking me to show how i have written custom validator for regex? > > Nope, how did you configure built-in regex validator, the *-validation.xml > file > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 4

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > are u asking me to show how i have written custom validator for regex? Nope, how did you configure built-in regex validator, the *-validation.xml file Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ ---

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
are u asking me to show how i have written custom validator for regex? On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > I am not sure who is "toy". > > *you > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > I am not sure who is "toy". *you Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: use

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
I am not sure who is "toy". On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > i use struts 2.3.12 > > Could you show how did toy define regex validator? As I said, > expression param name was changed to regex > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 1

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > i use struts 2.3.12 Could you show how did toy define regex validator? As I said, expression param name was changed to regex Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
i use struts 2.3.12 On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > something like "apple<>" (without quotes). > > Which version of Struts do you use? > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > ---

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
sorry for my comment. what you said is right. Thank you for that info. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > As far as i remember commons logging is one of the implementation of > log4j. > > but xworks classes does not use log4j. I am saying

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > something like "apple<>" (without quotes). Which version of Struts do you use? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.a

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Paul Benedict : > Did you add the ^ and $ like I suggested? Is really not needed, I have tested with the Showcase app, just modify FieldValidatorsExampleAction-submitFieldValidatorsExamples-validation.xml and you can see the desired behaviour Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Paul Benedict
Did you add the ^ and $ like I suggested? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < java.yaraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > something like "apple<>" (without quotes). > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Paul Benedict > wrote: > > > What input value are you testing against the regex?

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
something like "apple<>" (without quotes). On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > What input value are you testing against the regex? > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < > java.yaraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As far as i remember commons logging is one

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > As far as i remember commons logging is one of the implementation of log4j. > but xworks classes does not use log4j. I am saying this because i have used > the log that comes from the super class which is a xworks class and that is > not of log4j. No, is not. com

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Paul Benedict
What input value are you testing against the regex? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < java.yaraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > As far as i remember commons logging is one of the implementation of log4j. > but xworks classes does not use log4j. I am saying this because i have used

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
As far as i remember commons logging is one of the implementation of log4j. but xworks classes does not use log4j. I am saying this because i have used the log that comes from the super class which is a xworks class and that is not of log4j. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
I have modified the Showcase app and defined regexp as and everything works as expected. But I noticed one thing, I have renamed expression param into regex in 2.3.12, the question is which version do you use? http://struts.apache.org/development/2.x/docs/regex-validator.html Regards -- Łukas

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > I have added the following to log4j > > log4j.logger.com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.validators=debug > > But it doe not print anything on console. The logger was set for console > and for file.(both appenders) Log4j is supported throughout commons-logging Re

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
ok. will do. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Dave Newton wrote: > Put a SSCCE and its pom on github/etc and we'll take a look. AFAIK regex > validationworks fine for me. > On Mar 19, 2013 4:57 PM, "Muralidhar Yaragalla" > > wrote: > > > Hi, All the other validators are working fine except r

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Dave Newton
Put a SSCCE and its pom on github/etc and we'll take a look. AFAIK regex validationworks fine for me. On Mar 19, 2013 4:57 PM, "Muralidhar Yaragalla" wrote: > Hi, All the other validators are working fine except regex. > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Paul Benedict > wrote: > > > When th

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Hi, All the other validators are working fine except regex. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > When the validator isn't working, it could signify none of your validation > is working. Have you tried the "required-string" validator or anything else > is working? > > Paul > >

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Paul Benedict
When the validator isn't working, it could signify none of your validation is working. Have you tried the "required-string" validator or anything else is working? Paul On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < java.yaraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nothing works. I am not sure why? but

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Nothing works. I am not sure why? but then I am good with my custom validator for regex. One note is that xwork classes dont use log4j for logging. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > [^<>] means any character that is not the angled brackets. This is > correct syntax for XML

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Paul Benedict
[^<>] means any character that is not the angled brackets. This is correct syntax for XML encoding. Try also using the beginning and ending meta-characters: ^[^<>]$ Paul On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < java.yaraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, I tried with the regex

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Hi Chris, I tried with the regex that you suggested but it did not work. any way i am fed up understanding that validator so i have written my own and it works fine. Thanks all of you for helping me. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Chris Pratt wrote: > I'm pretty sure you can't use CDATA insid

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Chris Pratt
My bad, but the [^<>] should still work. (*Chirs*) On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Dave Newton wrote: > It's not an attribute value, it's an element's content. > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Chris Pratt >wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure you can't use CDATA inside an attribute value. H

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Dave Newton
It's not an attribute value, it's an element's content. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Chris Pratt wrote: > I'm pretty sure you can't use CDATA inside an attribute value. Have you > tried: "[^<>]" > (*Chris*) > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < > java.yaraga...@gma

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Chris Pratt
I'm pretty sure you can't use CDATA inside an attribute value. Have you tried: "[^<>]" (*Chris*) On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Muralidhar Yaragalla < java.yaraga...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have added the following to log4j > > log4j.logger.com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.validators=debug >

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
I have added the following to log4j log4j.logger.com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.validators=debug But it doe not print anything on console. The logger was set for console and for file.(both appenders) On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : >

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > Then i tried "jhbkkjnklj" this but no validation. > > when i press the submit button of the form the following log is being > generated on the server > > 2013-03-19 20:48:49 DEBUG cache:81 - > "template/xhtml/fielderror.ftl"["en_US",UTF-8,parsed] no source found.

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Then i tried "jhbkkjnklj" this but no validation. when i press the submit button of the form the following log is being generated on the server 2013-03-19 20:48:49 DEBUG cache:81 - "template/xhtml/fielderror.ftl"["en_US",UTF-8,parsed] no source found. 2013-03-19 20:48:49 DEBUG cache:81 - "templa

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > Hi I am using in my jsp. The value that i entered in the > field is "<>hjghj"(without quotes). So everything is ok, <>hjghj matches ^[<>]+ and there is no error. http://regexp.pl/main/show/182003 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Hi I am using in my jsp. The value that i entered in the field is "<>hjghj"(without quotes). On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > Now I tried "" this. when I did this the xml file does > > not show any error but the problem is validation d

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > Do u want me to change the application log4j level to debug or is there > anything that i should do in struts? log4j Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscr

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Do u want me to change the application log4j level to debug or is there anything that i should do in struts? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > The regex that i am trying works in java and also works with most regex > > engines but that i

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > Now I tried "" this. when I did this the xml file does > not show any error but the problem is validation does not happen. Ok, but what value did you try to enter into the field? Do you use / tag? or xhtml / css_xhtml theme? As simple theme doesn't present vali

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Now I tried "" this. when I did this the xml file does not show any error but the problem is validation does not happen. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > I tried but it shows up the earlier problem. (formatted character data) > > Did yo

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > The regex that i am trying works in java and also works with most regex > engines but that is not working with regex validator. RegexFieldValidator uses java.util.regex.Pattern internally, try to increase logging level to DEBUG for it and you should see in the lo

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > I tried but it shows up the earlier problem. (formatted character data) Did you put it inside CDATA block? You must use CDATA as < and > are xml specific characters. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
The regex that i am trying works in java and also works with most regex engines but that is not working with regex validator. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > If i pass "" in the xml file to the regex validator the > > xml file is not g

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
I tried but it shows up the earlier problem. (formatted character data) On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > > If i pass "" in the xml file to the regex validator the > > xml file is not generating any error but then the input is allowing the

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > If i pass "" in the xml file to the regex validator the > xml file is not generating any error but then the input is allowing the "<" > and ">" characters. That means still there is problem. Any help on this? Maybe the problem is with regex itself, try this one:

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
If i pass "" in the xml file to the regex validator the xml file is not generating any error but then the input is allowing the "<" and ">" characters. That means still there is problem. Any help on this? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : >

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > Basically i want use regular expressions in validators. xml experience is > fine but why sould i learn dtd syntax to write simple regex for regex > validator? Anyways the suggested regex with cdata by another user is also > not working. so any help on writing rege

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Dave Newton
Because the regex is in an XML file? Which has nothing to do with DTD syntax. On Mar 19, 2013 7:43 AM, "Muralidhar Yaragalla" wrote: > Basically i want use regular expressions in validators. xml experience is > fine but why sould i learn dtd syntax to write simple regex for regex > validator? An

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
Basically i want use regular expressions in validators. xml experience is fine but why sould i learn dtd syntax to write simple regex for regex validator? Anyways the suggested regex with cdata by another user is also not working. so any help on writing regex for regex validator which is equalent t

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/19 Muralidhar Yaragalla : > I tried with what you suggested. This gives different problem. I don't > think we should think about cdata and all. regex means it should be just > regex. You should think about taking some XML experience - CDATA has nothing to do with regex. Regards -- Łukasz

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Muralidhar Yaragalla
I tried with what you suggested. This gives different problem. I don't think we should think about cdata and all. regex means it should be just regex. kindly help in resolving this issue. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > Did you already try to put regex inside a cdat

Re: problem with regex validator

2013-03-19 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Did you already try to put regex inside a cdata section?