Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Chris Pratt
gt; > Good morning, > > > > It seems that "s:param" does not work well when more than one s:param is > > assigned. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The second "help_text_name" is never called. How com

Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Johannes Geppert
"help_text_name" is never called. How come? Found one line > bug report "lost URL parameters with tag (bug 1938)" at > http://readlist.com/lists/struts.apache.org/user/9/47016.html > > Do

Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Emi Lu
Are you intending for these values to come from your application resource bundle? That's where getText() gets it's values from. I believe it it doesn't find anything it just returns whatever is passed to is, which might be why you're seeing what I expect you are expecting. If you are actually

Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Chris Pratt
Are you intending for these values to come from your application resource bundle? That's where getText() gets it's values from. I believe it it doesn't find anything it just returns whatever is passed to is, which might be why you're seeing what I expect you are expecting. If you are actually tr

Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2010/7/20 Emi Lu : > > It's the expected behavior as you don't have these properties in your action. You're looking throughout message resources and not for action's variable. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl -

Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Emi Lu
On 07/20/2010 01:39 PM, Dale Newfield wrote: On 7/20/10 11:48 AM, Emi Lu wrote: It seems that "s:param" does not work well when more than one s:param is assigned. I use multiple param tags inside url tags all over the place. It does work. I would suggest running your application inside a debug

Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Dale Newfield
On 7/20/10 11:48 AM, Emi Lu wrote: It seems that "s:param" does not work well when more than one s:param is assigned. I use multiple param tags inside url tags all over the place. It does work. I would suggest running your application inside a debugger to find out what exactly is not workin

Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Brian Thompson
does not work well when more than one s:param is >> assigned. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The second "help_text_name" is never called. How come? Found one line >> bug report "lost URL parameters with tag (bug 1938)"

Re: lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Emi Lu
On 07/20/2010 11:48 AM, Emi Lu wrote: Good morning, It seems that "s:param" does not work well when more than one s:param is assigned. The second "help_text_name" is never called. How come? Found one line bug report "lost URL parameters with tag (bug 1938)"

lost URL parameters with tag

2010-07-20 Thread Emi Lu
Good morning, It seems that "s:param" does not work well when more than one s:param is assigned. The second "help_text_name" is never called. How come? Found one line bug report "lost URL parameters with tag (bug 1938)" at http://readlist.com/

Re: Struts 2 - lost URL parameters with tag (bug 1938)

2007-08-28 Thread Laurie Harper
[edit: include the URL for James' post] Riccardo Mollame wrote: Does anybody know about any fix or workaround to the mentioned bug? Did you see James Holmes' comment? [1] By the sound of it, there's no problem with the s:url tag itself, it's a question of how you subsequently use the value it

Re: Struts 2 - lost URL parameters with tag (bug 1938)

2007-08-28 Thread Laurie Harper
Riccardo Mollame wrote: Does anybody know about any fix or workaround to the mentioned bug? Did you see James Holmes' comment? [1] By the sound of it, there's no problem with the s:url tag itself, it's a question of how you subsequently use the value it produces. How are you using it? L.

Struts 2 - lost URL parameters with tag (bug 1938)

2007-08-27 Thread Riccardo Mollame
Does anybody know about any fix or workaround to the mentioned bug? For the record, it's the bug emerging when the contains more than one tag, in which case strange things happen (e.g. only one parameter is actually retrievable in the target action, the others producing the infamous nullPointerE