2022 o 14:59 Britta Katzenbach napisał(a):
>>
>> Yes, I see the discussion in the pull request. It definitely is not backward
>> compatible. As in the old simple checkbox template (struts 2.5), you always
>> generate the hidden input field. In struts 6 you added <
śr., 9 lis 2022 o 14:59 Britta Katzenbach napisał(a):
>
> Yes, I see the discussion in the pull request. It definitely is not backward
> compatible. As in the old simple checkbox template (struts 2.5), you always
> generate the hidden input field. In struts 6 yo
Yes, I see the discussion in the pull request. It definitely is not backward
compatible. As in the old simple checkbox template (struts 2.5), you always
generate the hidden input field. In struts 6 you added <#if
parameters.submitUnchecked!false>, so the hidden field is only generate
struts/pull/169
-- Original Message --
From "Britta Katzenbach"
To "Struts Users Mailing List"
Date 11/9/2022 7:10:54 AM
Subject Re: From ??? Re: Checkbox tag new attribute submitUnchecked
Hi Burton,
Thanks for the quick answer and the description! I was hoping for a
soluti
mes
>
> Thanks,
> Burton
>
> -- Original Message --
> From "Britta Katzenbach"
> To user@struts.apache.org
> Date 11/9/2022 2:40:19 AM
> Subject Checkbox tag new attribute submitUnchecked
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are migrating fr
ks,
Burton
-- Original Message --
From "Britta Katzenbach"
To user@struts.apache.org
Date 11/9/2022 2:40:19 AM
Subject Checkbox tag new attribute submitUnchecked
Hi,
We are migrating from struts 2.5 to 6.0.3. You have implemented the new
tag attribute submitUnchecked in the chec
Hi,
We are migrating from struts 2.5 to 6.0.3. You have implemented the new tag
attribute submitUnchecked in the checkbox. The default value is false. Is there
any way to set the attribute default value to true?
Best regards,
Britta
Britta Katzenbach
o list,
my problem is that i have a message resource key defined like this:
message.privacy=Die Datenschutzerklärung
when i use it in text tag like this:
all is ok an html is not escaped
but when i used it in checkbox tag like this:
html is escaped an my link is not working
is there a way
Hello list,
my problem is that i have a message resource key defined like this:
message.privacy=Die Datenschutzerklärung
when i use it in text tag like this:
all is ok an html is not escaped
but when i used it in checkbox tag like this:
html is escaped an my link is not working
is there
pe of behavioral control do you want? It's handled by the checkbox
template and the interceptor.
> * Can the document be updated to include these examples? (shall I open a
JIRA issue against the docs?)
Sure, or file a CLA and contribute some additional docs.
Dave
The "using checkboxes" page at
http://struts.apache.org/2.2.3/docs/using-checkboxes.html says:
The framework automatically tracks the checkboxes used by a form (so
you don't have to). If a checkbox is missing, a default value for the checkbox
(usually false) is injecte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 6/17/2011 3:46 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> On Friday, June 17, 2011, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> I can't believe I've been working with Struts for nearly 10 years and
>> I'm still using Struts 1.
>
> Fixed.
Yeah,
On Friday, June 17, 2011, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> I can't believe I've been working with Struts for nearly 10 years and
> I'm still using Struts 1.
Fixed.
> The problem is that if we check the box and submit to A2 (then show P2),
> then go back (either browser-BACK or using our "previous" bu
flow looks something like this:
P1 -> A1 ---> P2 -> A2 ---> Done
"P1" contains a checkbox called "emailNotification". The bean is defined
with a
The "Done" page would like to use the value of that form property to
decide (you guessed it) whether or not to
I think so.
In the final, if you want to submit any data to member of a list, the
[name] of the HTML element should be something like:
"listName[indexNumber].propertyName"
Or strust2 can not know where this parameter should be applied to.
If your code can work, the first thing should check is:
If
Actually, I have tested these sample codes before I sent it to you,
and it worked very well.
If it not working on your environment, maybe something else is getting wrong.
Does any exception message appeared?
2010/10/27 Peter Bliznak :
> Thanks for your time but what you show me is exactly what I
lready null . man :-(
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, satyanarayana katta
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> R u by any chance creating the new list in the a
list in the action class. If so
> > it
> > >> >> won't work and u will get null.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Sent from my iPhone
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Peter Bliznak
> >
ill get null.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sent from my iPhone
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Peter Bliznak
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Opps...damn gmail.
>> >&g
gt;
> >> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >> >>
> >> >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Peter Bliznak
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Opps...damn gmail.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As I&#x
liznak wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Opps...damn gmail.
>> >> >
>> >> > As I've said I am using pretty much same approach as it was suggested
>> >> above
>> >> > by
my iPhone
> >>
> >> On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Peter Bliznak wrote:
> >>
> >> > Opps...damn gmail.
> >> >
> >> > As I've said I am using pretty much same approach as it was suggested
> >> above
> >> >
>> >
>> > As I've said I am using pretty much same approach as it was suggested
>> above
>> > by the other poster.
>> > I have list:
>> > private List workOrderTaskList;
>> >
>> > with gett
e List workOrderTaskList;
> >
> > with getter and setter'
> >
> > EAch : WorkOrderTask have :
> > Long id;
> > boolean completed ;// checkbox
> >
> > with getters and setter's
> >
> > in jsp itera
bove
> by the other poster.
> I have list:
> private List workOrderTaskList;
>
> with getter and setter'
>
> EAch : WorkOrderTask have :
> Long id;
> boolean completed ;// checkbox
>
> with getters and setter's
&
Opps...damn gmail.
As I've said I am using pretty much same approach as it was suggested above
by the other poster.
I have list:
private List workOrderTaskList;
with getter and setter'
EAch : WorkOrderTask have :
Long id;
boolean completed ;// checkbox
with getters and setter
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Peter Bliznak wrote:
> As I've said I am using pretty much same approach as it was suggested above
> by the other poster. I have list.
Well, both Ying and I do it in a way that works, so I'd suggest
there's at least *some* difference in our approaches. Without any
ces,
> but mine, like all other books, have a limited number of pages, and
> which information is included/excluded is not always up to the author.
>
> The reason the docs for checkbox don't address this typical case is
> because it has nothing specifically to do with checkboxe
ses a typical pain point.
And my book specifically *did* address many types of best practices,
but mine, like all other books, have a limited number of pages, and
which information is included/excluded is not always up to the author.
The reason the docs for checkbox don't address this typic
Thanks for your time but what you show me is exactly what I was already
doing but inputted changes are NOT being seen in that list when I tried
to post it. That was my question or rather problem
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Li Ying wrote:
> My way to solve this kind of problem:
>
> (1)
Listen I googled quite a while before I asked here and all I saw was sea of
lost souls asking same question dating back to 2007...but NOT answers...if
it is so simple and obvious then why docs for checkbox are not mentioning
this trivial case. .. BTW would you please point me to the site where
Oh, I understand. Definitely agree; I think the OP just isn't aware of
some S2 functionality and/or best practices, that's all.
Dave
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010, Li Ying wrote:
> I mean:
>
> Representing associated data by a DTO class and then holding DTO
> instances in one List
>
> is better t
I mean:
Representing associated data by a DTO class and then holding DTO
instances in one List
is better than
Holding data in several separated Lists each represent one column.
2010/10/26 Dave Newton :
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Li Ying wrote:
>> I think this is a better design, becau
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Li Ying wrote:
> I think this is a better design, because the data modal is more
> compliant with OO principles.
Better than what?
(And as an aside, there's nothing particularly OO about what's
essentially a struct, although from a pragmatic viewpoint,
particularl
My way to solve this kind of problem:
(1) Use a DTO class as the data modal for columns of each row.
Every column is represented by one property of the DTO class.
For example:
public class Info {
private boolean use;
private String name;
private int id;
// getter
what it does. I guess no way around
> it
> >
> > PS as for what I checked before - that was lift and wicked..somehow I
> found
> > it friendlier but hey that might be just my opinion :-)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Dave Newton
> wrote:
>
n Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
>
>> Hidden parameters are the only way to get a value for an unchecked
>> checkbox, that's just how HTML works. But yes, you're wrong; the
>> checkbox interceptor does the work for you. Please read the
>> docu
nly way to get a value for an unchecked
> checkbox, that's just how HTML works. But yes, you're wrong; the
> checkbox interceptor does the work for you. Please read the
> documentation and just try it.
>
> Dave
>
> (Cumbersome? Compared to what?)
>
> On Monday
Hidden parameters are the only way to get a value for an unchecked
checkbox, that's just how HTML works. But yes, you're wrong; the
checkbox interceptor does the work for you. Please read the
documentation and just try it.
Dave
(Cumbersome? Compared to what?)
On Monday, October 25, 2
...I hope I am wrong -
sounds very cumbersome for 2010.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> Same way they're generated now, with the checkbox tag, or by hand. Or use a
> map.
>
> And there's no "of course": people use both versions.
>
> Dave
>
Same way they're generated now, with the checkbox tag, or by hand. Or use a map.
And there's no "of course": people use both versions.
Dave
On Monday, October 25, 2010, Peter Bliznak wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> using S2 of course.
> not sure I am getting what you sugge
I have a list over which I am iterating - it has checkbox and other
> fields.
> > I know I can define array associated with checkbox's values but that only
> > returns values which were checked. In my other column I have date and I
> have
> > to make that date
Which version of Struts?
Struts 2 uses a hidden field to deal with default (unchecked) values.
Struts 1 ActionForms used the reset() method to pre-load default
values.
Dave
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Peter Bliznak wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a list over which I am iterating - it has ch
Hi,
I have a list over which I am iterating - it has checkbox and other fields.
I know I can define array associated with checkbox's values but that only
returns values which were checked. In my other column I have date and I have
to make that date associated with checkbox's state
Hi all!
Im trying to bind an Ajax-Call to the onclick-Event of a Checkbox:
Here is the code so fare:
...
targets="otherdiv" href="myaction.action" />
...
The AJAX-Call works great. The Action is called and the DIV-Element in
the targets-Field is upd
On 5/6/10 4:15 AM, RogerV wrote:
The documentation says that the checkbox interceptor "Looks for a hidden
identification field that specifies the original value of the checkbox. If
the checkbox isn't submitted, insert it into the parameters as if it was
with the value of 'fals
The documentation says that the checkbox interceptor "Looks for a hidden
identification field that specifies the original value of the checkbox. If
the checkbox isn't submitted, insert it into the parameters as if it was
with the value of 'false'."
Should the intercep
Hi Struts users:
I'm working with Struts 2 (v 2.1.6) and I have the following problem:
I have a list of notifications, which I display in a table in a jsp:
As you can see, each notification has a checkbox: if the user selects a
notification, its Id is sent to the action
I really think this is a bug in Struts 2 checkbox array behaviour!
to solve this problem I have created a variable to keep the value of the
previous selection.
if the actual selection is equals to the previous selection that means the
user want to uncheck the checkbox
this at least works, and is
Post the relevant part of your JSP, please. I know that at least for
Struts 2.1.8.1 there is a new MultiselectInterceptor class that would
solve your problem for a select with type=multiple. There is a
CheckboxInterceptor class as well. Maybe there is none for a checkbox
array. Anyway, let us
Tatiyana Tarabara schrieb:
Voviya,
Could you please pick up Nadika from horse riding at 7:30 p.m. today?
A ya popletus' v Majer.
T.
No i won't, sorry. :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For addit
mmm I'm using Struts 2 (struts2-core-2.1.6) and the last checkbox (of a
checkbox array) doesn't get unchecked, as I have previously commented...
WHY?
It seems it has to be always selected one of the checkboxes at least
2010/2/23 Robert Graf-Waczenski
> lucas owen schrieb:
>
&
Voviya,
Could you please pick up Nadika from horse riding at 7:30 p.m. today?
A ya popletus' v Majer.
T.
Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
lucas owen schrieb:
Hi struts users,
I'm working with a checkbox array; the problem is that it doesn't work
as a
single checkbox: I can'
lucas owen schrieb:
Hi struts users,
I'm working with a checkbox array; the problem is that it doesn't work as a
single checkbox: I can't have the checkbox array with all checkboxes
unchecked (apart from the beginning)
Example:
I check checkbox1.
I check checkbox2.
I uncheck c
Hi struts users,
I'm working with a checkbox array; the problem is that it doesn't work as a
single checkbox: I can't have the checkbox array with all checkboxes
unchecked (apart from the beginning)
Example:
I check checkbox1.
I check checkbox2.
I uncheck checkbox2 --> OK
I
The use "accounts" in s:iterator is wrong. It probably works if you can create
something like "new int [7]".
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:50:36 -0600
> Subject: Re: checkbox : unchecked elements not in list
> From: elephant...@gmail.com
> To: user@struts.apache.
On my form bean, I have boolean values
for each of the checkboxes and set the checkbox to use
the field name:
When the user submits the form, everything
works as expected.
Can you do that in your app instead of processing the
request params yourself?
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In my action class I have following
>
> public UpdateAccount account
> {
>List accountStatus;//list to hold all the checkbox values
>List accounts; //list to hold all the accounts values
>
>// getter setters
>
>
I have following form
.
In my action class I have following
public UpdateAccount account
{
List accountStatus;//list to hold all the checkbox values
List accounts; //list to hold all the accounts values
// getter setters
public String execute
Hello,
I am trying to use client side validations through ...-validation.xml in
struts2
I have it working but only for text and file input fields. I need to
validate if a checkbox is checked. using "required" or "requiredstring"
validators always validates as the field as
I am trying to add checkboxes in table column and unable to do so.
need to send a boolean value when the checkbox is checked otherwise false.
*
Created a bean for each row in the table
Have a bean Employee
firstName
lastname
You may need a getter method isIsChecked() or getIsChecked()
-Original Message-
From: Dan R. Olsen III [mailto:danec...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 6:19 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Setting a checkbox
I have the following tag:
isChecked is a boolean
I have the following tag:
isChecked is a boolean variable that is set in the action. When I put a
variable in the name field for a textfield tag it will bring up the
value of the variable in the text box. I want the checkbox above to be
checked if isChecked is true and not checked if
nto your action for you.
(*Chris*)
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> - Original Message
> > From: pallav_bora
> > To: user@struts.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2009 11:16:37 AM
> > Subject: Checkbox and hidden field
> >
- Original Message
> From: pallav_bora
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2009 11:16:37 AM
> Subject: Checkbox and hidden field
>
>
> Hi I am using Struts 2.1.6
>
> I am using simple theme. When I use a checkbox tag , a hidden field is
Hi I am using Struts 2.1.6
I am using simple theme. When I use a checkbox tag , a hidden field is
automatically iserted in the final HTML. Please let me know how to get rid
of this hidden field. I have given code sample below:
Code in JSP:
Code in HTML:
Thanks
Pallav
--
View this
Hi guys,
I have a checkbox
in an iterator.
However after the validation fail.
The value of the varible "test" in the valuestack became "true, ",
then after servral fail submit the value of the the varible "test" in
the valuestack became "true,
true,
Thanks Martin,
The method won’t error out on null values. The first part of the method
returns a false if either obj1 or obj2 are null.
I’d already isolated the code. The problem I’m having is that the Array
containing my checkbox selected values would occasionally contain a null
value in the
I¹m getting a freemarker error when I use a s:checkboxlist tag and the
array which contains my item values is empty.
When I had a look at the stack trace it¹s pointing me to the following
error:
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.struts2.util.ContainUtil.contains(Con
Hi,
I'm trying to understand the different between fieldValue and value
attributes of the checkbox tag.
I'm asking this because the checkbox is unchecked even though the
field associated with it has the same value as the fieldValue. (i.e
redemption.countryNotice=="N")
B
I think I found the problem. All of my check boxes have the same
name. After examining the code in the interceptor:
if (key.startsWith("__checkbox_")) {
String name = key.substring("__checkbox_".length());
iterator.remove();
// is t
After reading some more documentation I tried :
-1
completeDefault is a stack I created which includes the checkbox interceptor.
This is still not setting the value in my int array.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Richard Sayre wrote:
> The Struts 2 docs says
The Struts 2 docs says the following about the Checkbox Interceptor:
setUncheckedValue - The default value of an unchecked box can be
overridden by setting the 'uncheckedValue' property.
Where in code can I call the setUncheckedValue(String uncheckedValue) from?
The problem I am fac
Declare boolean type of variable in your action class for each of the
checkbox. Make sure you have generated the getters/setters. If you have
selected the checkbox, framework will set the corresponding var to true and
if not it will set it to false.
HTH
-Original Message-
From: m.harig
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/checkbox-doubt-tp21414570p21414570.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional comman
geContext.PAGE_SCOPE);
am getting the output . but my all my check box has been cheked. am
using javascript to uncheck it. is there any option to use checked=false in
the multibox tag itself.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/checkbox-tp21414451p2141445
Hello,
I have hopefully an answer and a question for you.
first the answer :
I got the list of checkboxes working by using the "fieldValvue" attribute of
> hello,
>
> I spend a lot of time to make a checkbox list work and try the following :
>
> 1. with texfield
AFAIK there's no way to get complicated HTML into a standard HTML select box;
this doesn't have anything to do with Struts though.
You can (somewhat, anyway?) duplicate the effect with a scrollable DIV,
although you'd have to handle most of the normal select semantics yourself. I'd
be more like
hello all,
i was wondering if it is possible at all to get checkboxes into a select in
struts...
any help would be appreciated.
here is a sample code that i used although it did not work the way i wanted it
to. the checkboxes are being placed outside of the select component.
dada
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a checkbox in jsp:
>
> ,
> after html rendering it is shown as name="user.contactConfidential" value="Y"
> id="user.contactConfidential"/>, that is good.
>
> But once a user selects the checkbox and su
I have a checkbox in jsp:
,
after html rendering it is shown as , that is good.
But once a user selects the checkbox and submits the form,
user.contactConfidential is set to true. However, on the database side
the value should be stored as 'Y' or 'N'. Is there a
oolean type (true/false)..
Or
Good luke.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Struts Two <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a checkbox as follows in a jsp:
> id="ticket.ccUpdateFlag" />
> Once a user selects the checkbox and submits the form, ccUpdateFlag is set
&g
I have a checkbox as follows in a jsp:
Once a user selects the checkbox and submits the form, ccUpdateFlag is set to
true. However, on the database side the value is stored as 'Y' or 'N' . So my
getCcUpdateFlag returns 'Y' or 'N' depending on the fact cc
this message.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: problem with checkbox
--- On Mon, 8/18/08, Muralidhar Y wrote:
> Hi , when I typed the c
--- On Mon, 8/18/08, Muralidhar Y wrote:
> Hi , when I typed the code in my jsp like the following
>
> value="one" />
>
> In the html file the following code is being shown. By
> default the attribute value is being true. Instead I want
> to give some other value. Kindly help.
>
Hi , when I typed the code in my jsp like the following
In the html file the following code is being shown. By default the attribute
value is being true. Instead I want to give some other value. Kindly help.
Warm regards,
Muralidhar Y
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Main: 877 KENSIUM (536
I can't quite
get it to
work: the proper ognl expression to use to get the value of a
checkbox w/in
nested iterator tags.
I've got an ArrayList of Parent objects called parentList. Each
Parent
object contains another array of Child objects called childList.
A Child
object h
you write a getSelected() getter? or is it an isSelected() getter?
2008/8/7, Kevin Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is probably simple and I think I'm close, but I can't quite
get it to
work: the proper ognl expression to use to get the value of a
checkbox w/in
nested iterator ta
work: the proper ognl expression to use to get the value of a checkbox w/in
> nested iterator tags.
>
> I've got an ArrayList of Parent objects called parentList. Each Parent
> object contains another array of Child objects called childList. A Child
> object has an boolean
This is probably simple and I think I'm close, but I can't quite get
it to work: the proper ognl expression to use to get the value of a
checkbox w/in nested iterator tags.
I've got an ArrayList of Parent objects called parentList. Each
Parent object contains another
Hi,
Please discard this email. as my action mapping is wrong it is behaving
like this, now i could fix the issue.
Sorry.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Narayana S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my form I have employee number, name, and roles, here employee
> number and name are
Hi,
In my form I have employee number, name, and roles, here employee number
and name are text fields and roles is a checkboxlist, to generate the list
boxes i had a map called rolesMap in my action class, as well i have a set
called userRoles that specifies the items to be selected.
*jsp*
yes it doesnt. Atleast in version 2.0.9. i heard its fixed in 2.1 version.
you can write a reset interceptor also for this. i.e. always (before param
interceptor) reset the checkbox field. If there is some checkbox getting
submitted then you will get them, else the field would be reset by the
b.
>
> Best greetings,
> Paweł Wielgus.
>
> On 10/07/2008, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> --- On Wed, 7/9/08, Owen Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > You need to have a hidden field value that will take the
>> > place of the disa
ue that will take the
> > place of the disabled checkbox as some browsers do not
> > send disabled field values.
>
>
> The tag already includes the hidden field; I don't know what
> it does for disabled checkboxes, though. The checkbox interceptor *should*
--- On Wed, 7/9/08, Owen Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to have a hidden field value that will take the
> place of the disabled checkbox as some browsers do not
> send disabled field values.
The tag already includes the hidden field; I don't know what
You need to have a hidden field value that will take the place of the
disabled checkbox as some browsers do not send disabled field values.
Basically, it's just for display.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Lukasz Lenart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you try with some others bro
Did you try with some others browsers, like IE, FF?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Using struts tag for a checkbox. I disable my checkbox using disabled property
so that user cannot change it. When the form is submitted, the value of the
checkbox passed to the action comes out as false, even if the checkbox was
selected (true).
The weird thing is if I remove the
Thanks Oscar,
I did check on the displayTag (since yesterday)so, I understand that I
need to have something like this:
and the checkBox:
but: '%{myid[current]}' doesn't work.
this works: '%{myid[0]}'
'%{myid[1]}'
&#x
1 - 100 of 432 matches
Mail list logo
