Re: WW if question

2013-07-09 Thread Fabian Richter
Am 09.07.2013 11:15, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: getters? And maybe use just one value instead of two searchResult? Getters are present for the one from the action, without the # I need both for an evil hack, I have a page that consists of a form and a list which are seperate actions and after s

Re: WW if question

2013-07-09 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/7/9 Fabian Richter : > Am 09.07.2013 11:07, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: >> >> Have you tried this: >> >> > > Yes, I did, didnt work :( getters? And maybe use just one value instead of two searchResult? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --

Re: WW if question

2013-07-09 Thread Fabian Richter
Am 09.07.2013 11:07, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Have you tried this: Yes, I did, didnt work :( smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift

Re: WW if question

2013-07-09 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Have you tried this: 2013/7/9 Fabian Richter : > Hey, > > quick question (I know WW is EOL maybe someone will help me nonetheless): > > Why does > > > > not work as expected? > > Depending on the call, searchResult is either from the action or set by > ww:set but the if only evaluates the one

WW if question

2013-07-09 Thread Fabian Richter
Hey, quick question (I know WW is EOL maybe someone will help me nonetheless): Why does not work as expected? Depending on the call, searchResult is either from the action or set by ww:set but the if only evaluates the one from the action -> searchResult and if its empty does not proceed t