ext:
http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/Struts2-Pre-populate-form-with-values-from-a-session-bean-tp3487976p4300972.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsub
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
getmFoo() as getter works just fine here with S2 as it did
since almost eight years with S1.
Which version of S2? I'll re-check when I get home and follow up.
Thanks,
Dave
--
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> getmFoo() as getter works just fine here with S2 as it did
> since almost eight years with S1.
Which version of S2? I'll re-check when I get home and follow up.
Thanks,
Dave
-
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
[...] I was guessing in that direction already but wanted
a guru to confirm this first, which is what you did.
Minus the "guru" part ;)
That's our naming spec and we have decided to also use
this spec for bean pr
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
> [...] I was guessing in that direction already but wanted
> a guru to confirm this first, which is what you did.
Minus the "guru" part ;)
> That's our naming spec and we have decided to also use
> this spec for bean property names, hence the ge
Dave,
your comments helped me resolve the issue, see my comments below.
Dave Newton wrote:
A couple of comments, although with the configuration provided I'm not getting
as far as you are.
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
name="com.blah.blurp"
ex
A couple of comments, although with the configuration provided I'm not getting
as far as you are.
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
>
> name="com.blah.blurp"
>extends="struts-default">
> class="com.blah.blurp.actions2.AddAction">
>
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
I'm using Struts 2.0.14, any chance that this is a fixed bug?
If it is unknown, i'll go file a bug then.
I dunno; I've used this pattern on a few apps (ScopedModelDriven, too) so I'm
skeptical it's a bug. Could you p
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
> I'm using Struts 2.0.14, any chance that this is a fixed bug?
> If it is unknown, i'll go file a bug then.
I dunno; I've used this pattern on a few apps (ScopedModelDriven, too) so I'm
skeptical it's a bug. Could you post the config for the act
Dave Newton wrote:
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
The form field is only pre-filled if i explicitly use
value="#session...", but with this, [...]
If the action implements modelDriven, and the getModel() call returns the
session bean under mySessionBeanKey, then yo
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Robert Graf-Waczenski wrote:
> value="#session.mySessionBeanKey.theValue"/>
>
> The form field is only pre-filled if i explicitly use
> value="#session...", but with this, [...]
If the action implements modelDriven, and the getModel() call returns the
session bean under myS
Hi!
We were previously using Struts1 session scope form beans to achieve
what we feel was rather natural: We frequently have a pattern were a
user needs to change some settings in some model bean stored in a
persistent storage. With Struts1, we had a jsp with a tag
that was bound to an actio
12 matches
Mail list logo