ied various other ways, like > value="%{Search.dataFromSessionBean}" /> among others, but none works.
>
> You don't have to define anything in the struts.xml file. The action
> instance is always pushed onto the stack, and is usually the top bean on
> the
> stack, unless
On 12/2/06 10:45 AM, "fahlen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I've tried this now, but I'm unable to access the data from the JSP. In the
> struts.xml configuration file, the action involved is configured this way:
>
>
> /crosseyed/Search.jsp
> Display
>
rk
> --
> Mark Menard
> personal: http://www.vitarara.org/
> business: http://www.vitarara.net/
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
Mark Menard wrote:
> On 11/30/06 7:45 PM, "Christopher Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Sorry for poking my nose in, but wouldn't this be horrendously
>> non-threadsafe?
>
> No problem. If your thinking of Actions from the perspective o
Thank you all for your replies! They have been very helpful. I'm happy to
have found such an active forum.
Thanks again.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-and-passing-data-using-interceptors-tf2734105.html#a7634983
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list ar
On 11/30/06 7:45 PM, "Christopher Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mark Menard wrote:
>> public String getDataRetrievedFromSessionBean () {
>> return this.dataRetrievedFromSessionBean;
>> }
>
> Sorry for poking my nose in, but wouldn't this be horrendously
> non-threadsafe?
No proble
What makes it not thread safe? If you are thinking in terms of s1, then
yes, but s2 actions are not reused and can therefore keep state as you
normally would have had to put in a s1 formbean.
On 11/30/06, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
Mark Menard wrote:
> public String getDataRetrievedFromSessionBean () {
> return this.dataRetrievedFromSessionBean;
> }
Sorry for poking my nose in, but wouldn't this be horrendously
non-threadsafe?
Since I know virtually nothing about
On 11/30/06 5:29 PM, "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you only need request-scoped data, you don't need to bother with
> the ScopeInterceptor or even the ServletRequestAware interface.
> Simply define a getter on your action that returns the object in
> question, then access it via your
ut if there's a standard method
for this functionality provided by the framework, then I guess that would be
the preferred way to go.
I'm grateful for any input on the matter. Cheers.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-and-passing-data-using-interceptors-tf2
by the framework, then I guess that would be
the preferred way to go.
I'm grateful for any input on the matter. Cheers.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-and-passing-data-using-interceptors-tf2734105.html#a7627298
Sent from the Struts - User mail
11 matches
Mail list logo