Re: SV: SV: SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-08 Thread Laurie Harper
! /Gunnar -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Dale Newfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 7 oktober 2008 17:39 Till: Struts Users Mailing List Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Ognl versions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a measureList that looks the same and it works! It's not quite the

SV: SV: SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-07 Thread Gunnar.Bostrom
em! Thanks for all help! /Gunnar > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: Dale Newfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: den 7 oktober 2008 17:39 > Till: Struts Users Mailing List > Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Ognl versions > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We have a m

Re: SV: SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-07 Thread Dale Newfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a measureList that looks the same and it works! It's not quite the same, since it's capitalization is correct. public SortedMap getMeasureList() { Chris Pratt wrote: Just as an experiment, you might try renaming the method as a true JavaBean method. May

SV: SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-07 Thread Gunnar.Bostrom
n 7 oktober 2008 09:15 > Till: Struts Users Mailing List > Ämne: Re: SV: Ognl versions > > Just as an experiment, you might try renaming the method as a > true JavaBean method. Maybe OGNL got more strict on it's > interpretation of the spec. > (*Chris*) > >

Re: SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-07 Thread Chris Pratt
P-flytt"); >// return this.getWc().getTypeAsText(); >return jobTypeList; >} > > /Gunnar > > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > > Från: Dale Newfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skickat: den 6 oktober 2008 20:34 > > Till: Bostro

SV: SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-06 Thread Gunnar.Bostrom
er@struts.apache.org > Ämne: Re: SV: Ognl versions > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The jobTypelist is empty, but it worked with 2.6.11 version of ognl. > > The applications is our own. > > So you're saying that the updated version doesn't silently &

Re: SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-06 Thread Dale Newfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The jobTypelist is empty, but it worked with 2.6.11 version of ognl. The applications is our own. So you're saying that the updated version doesn't silently fail, and that's enough to condemn it? I would argue that that's an improvement. In fact, if you look in the

RE: SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-06 Thread Martin Gainty
party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. > Subject: SV: Ognl versions > Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:08:52 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: user@struts.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > The j

SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-06 Thread Gunnar.Bostrom
ngOrde > rSearch_jsp.java:1024) > >at > > > org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.jsp.ordermanagement.ongoingOrder.on > goingOrderSearch_jsp._jspx_meth_s_005fform_005f0(ongoingOrderS > earch_jsp.java:456) > >at > > > org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.jsp.order

SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-03 Thread Gunnar.Bostrom
> Skickat: den 3 oktober 2008 08:24 > Till: user@struts.apache.org > Ämne: SV: Ognl versions > > Ok, then I take version 2.7.2 for a spin. > /Gunnar > > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > > Från: Chris Pratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Skickat: den 2 ok

SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-02 Thread Gunnar.Bostrom
Ok, then I take version 2.7.2 for a spin. /Gunnar > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: Chris Pratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: den 2 oktober 2008 17:42 > Till: Struts Users Mailing List > Ämne: Re: Ognl versions > > I have been using OGNL 2.7.2 with Struts 2.0.11.2 and 2.1.2 >

SV: Ognl versions

2008-10-02 Thread Gunnar.Bostrom
Hi, I can see that many of my threads stays blocked for a long time in gnl.OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod line 511. If this is to any help. :-) > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: den 2 oktober 2008 12:11 > Till: user@struts.apache.or