I'm not sure it is a stupid question... I guess this enters the realm of
generic Java question, but I can't say I've ever thought about this
before... what happens if you have a class that implements serializable,
and you then extend that class and add a member that is NOT serializable?
Does that
That's a very good point. I feel like I've asked a stupid question now -
duh!
Thanks Starki
On 30 Sep 2005 at 9:52, starki78 wrote:
> I don't know if you have to use implements at all
> because
> the super-class does already implement it.
> What would you like to achieve?
>
> Regards Star
I don't know if you have to use implements at all
because
the super-class does already implement it.
What would you like to achieve?
Regards Starki
-- Initial Header ---
>From : "Murray Collingwood" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : user@struts.apache.org
Cc :
Date
3 matches
Mail list logo
