Re: form method

--- stanlick wrote: > I wanted to steer away from writing yet another > interceptor to handle something that should be > built-in. Submit a patch, but check to see if the new stuff already handles RESTfulness properly to avoid duplication of effort. > I think the struts-default.xml interceptor

Re: form method

Thank Dave. I wanted to steer away from writing yet another interceptor to handle something that should be built-in. BTW, I think the struts-default.xml interceptor stack for executeAndWaitStack needs to be fixed in 2.0.9. It specifies the execAndWait ref twice! Scott newton.dave wrote: >

Re: form method

--- stanlick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way in S2 to specify that say > /order/checkOut.action should only be > processed if it was submitted as a METHOD="POST"? > I'm trying to close the door on an accidental > request through the address bar! Nothing built-in that I'm aware of, al