Re: Wildcard action/result names v. Validation

2007-10-10 Thread Dave Newton
Awesome --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think I got a result named "*" to work like this > with wildcards > > On 10/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Do you mean that you don't have a foo_input.jsp? > > > > No, I mean tha

Re: Wildcard action/result names v. Validation

2007-10-10 Thread stanlick
I think I got a result named "*" to work like this with wildcards On 10/9/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you mean that you don't have a foo_input.jsp? > > No, I mean that since I have no named "input" result > that it pukes and

Re: Wildcard action/result names v. Validation

2007-10-09 Thread Dave Newton
--- Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you mean that you don't have a foo_input.jsp? No, I mean that since I have no named "input" result that it pukes and won't take me to foo_input.jsp -- I assume it's looking for explicitly configured results? It's not that it doesn't make sense,

Re: Wildcard action/result names v. Validation

2007-10-09 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Hey Dave, I am not sure if I understand what you are looking for? Do you mean that you don't have a foo_input.jsp? I am not sure if it will help, but the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor is a bit configurable. You can change the string returned by failed validation by configuring the interceptor... i.e.