Jim Barrows wrote:
The one thing I hate doing is trying to figure out someonelses undocumented framework.
+1. I've been in that situation before, and believe me, it's an
unenviable position that I wouldn't wish on my worst enemies! :)
Vamsee.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:49:11 -0500, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Jim Barrows wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:24:01 -0800 (PST), nitin dubey
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> I respectfully disagree with this (unless you guys are talking about
> some other specific prod
Jim Barrows wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:24:01 -0800 (PST), nitin dubey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it worth using Struts for a static site that is CMS
Driven ? I can think of two options:
Yes.
1. Fetching the data from database into Action forms
and then building the page using Stru
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:24:01 -0800 (PST), nitin dubey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it worth using Struts for a static site that is CMS
> Driven ? I can think of two options:
Yes.
>
> 1. Fetching the data from database into Action forms
> and then building the page using Struts HTML taglibs.
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
