You say the project will be heavily AJAX-based, so you may want to look at
the AJAX support S2 provides. If it suits your needs, you may well want
to take the plunge because not only is S2 generally easier to develop for,
you can also avoid most of the client-side code, so any learning curve
setba
PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:53:38 +0100
Subject: RE: Struts 2.0 vs Struts 1.3.5 vs Struts 1.2
From: Tom Schneider
> Joe Germuska wrote:
> > Struts 2 is substantially different. I would not expect a Struts 1
> > developer to implement a project on the same time f
From: Tom Schneider
> Joe Germuska wrote:
> > Struts 2 is substantially different. I would not expect a Struts 1
> > developer to implement a project on the same time frame if it also
> > included learning to switch to Struts 2.
> I disagree to a certain degree. If the project is large enough and
Joe Germuska wrote:
Struts 1.3.5 is intended to be essentially backwards compatible with
1.2.x;
information on the details is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13
Struts 2 is substantially different. I would not expect a Struts 1
developer to implement a project on the
Struts 1.3.5 is intended to be essentially backwards compatible with 1.2.x;
information on the details is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13
Struts 2 is substantially different. I would not expect a Struts 1
developer to implement a project on the same time frame if it
5 matches
Mail list logo
