Again, sharing my opinion on his points with you guys.
* "The DynaActionForm bloats up the Struts config file with the xml based
definition. This gets annoying as the Struts Config file grow larger."
I use FormDef, so this isn't a problem for me.
* "The DynaActionForm is not strongly typed as t
For most forms, you can probably get away with just using a DynaActionForm
and combining it with the Validator. I still use ActionForm subclasses for
really complex forms because of the control they provide. (I have a form with
two dimensional indexed properties plus mapped properties, all in one
Eric,
perhaps this is useful for you.
http://weblogs.java.net/pub/wlg/964
cheers,
matthias
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Noel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 7:35 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Struts 1.1 ActionForm
>
>
> What is now the reco
3 matches
Mail list logo
