Martin-
I could, but it's really nasty. I've pasted the function where I use
execScripts() below. See my response to Frank prior to this response.
Basically the JSP page we're requesting via the AJAX call is dynamically
building an HTML table with options retrieved from the database and
pr
Frank-
Yikes, I had no idea this thread would take on a life of its
own...regardless, the execScripts function was exactly what I was
looking forhad to tweak it to accomodate for the
"type='text/javascript'" attribute on an opening
t those two
errors below.
Levan Dvalishvili
Support Lead US
Verticali,Inc
(646) 736 - 6075
-Original Message-
From: Chris Pratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:08 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts, AJAX, JSP, and JavaScript question
(
Hi Adam-
Could you post your JSP?
in particular could we see XMLHttpRequest.OnReadyStateChange AND the javascript
function which is the receptor for the Asynchronous call
Thanks,
M
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information for the use of t
From: Chris Pratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> eval() evaluates JavaScript, not XML or HTML.
Well, in FF, apparently it evaluates XML to some degree, huh?
Dave
> On 11/29/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > (interestingly, in IE I
eval() evaluates JavaScript, not XML or HTML.
(*Chris*)
On 11/29/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (interestingly, in IE I get a syntax error, because it's trying to
> interpret the markup as script, but in FF it just quietly doesn't
Yeah, can't say I knew it either :)
One would assume then that what you ge back from eval()'ing valid XML is a
Document object that you can then use DOM methods on, just as you do in IE
if you get responseXML from XMLHttpRequest (assuming it was in fact an XML
response)... that'd be pretty close t
s
> - Original Message -
> From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Struts, AJAX, JSP, and JavaScript question
>
>
>> That will only work i
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I guess maybe it examines the contents your eval'ing
> and differentiates between pure markup and script? Interesting!
It must be; I didn't know it would do that.
My first thought (here, by "thought" I mean "hope") was that FF had made
XML into
Yeah, those messages make sense I think... I guess FF realizes that your
trying to eval something that's purely markup and tries to parse it as
XML... incorrect nesting of the tags in the first case makes sense for
that message, as no closing tag makes sense for the second, if it were
trying to par
You will save a lot of time if you use something that is done already,
and tested, like the links provided by Frank. If you still want to try
it yourself you can check "Bind.js" :
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/org/apache/struts2/static/dojo/struts/wid
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Chris Loschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Perhaps I'm missing something
>
> Yes; that eval evaluates *javascript*.
...generally.
In FireBug if you eval("baz") in the console it will print a bold
"baz".
Dave
From: Chris Loschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Perhaps I'm missing something
Yes; that eval evaluates *javascript*.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sure if that makes sense -- still waking up this morning. Hope it helps.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 7:49 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts, AJAX, JSP, and JavaScript question
From: Frank W. Zammetti
or copying of it or its
contents
- Original Message -
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: Struts, AJAX, JSP, and JavaScript question
> That will only work if
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (interestingly, in IE I get a syntax error, because it's trying to
> interpret the markup as script, but in FF it just quietly doesn't
> work, not even a notice in Firebug).
Something else interesting in FF:
eval("")
"XML tag name mismatch"
That will only work if the response is nothing but JavaScript, in which
case your 100% correct (although many people say that eval() should be
renamed evil() and should be avoided like the plague... I'm not *quite*
that extreme in my avoidance of it).
As a quick proof:
var
Or you could just call eval(ajax.responseText).
(*Chris*)
On 11/28/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Adam,
If your doing straight AJAX yourself, i.e., directly interacting with the
XMLHttpRequest object, this won't execute script for you automatically.
In fact, it won't do m
Hi Adam,
If your doing straight AJAX yourself, i.e., directly interacting with the
XMLHttpRequest object, this won't execute script for you automatically.
In fact, it won't do much of anything for you automatially, aside from
parsing XML if that's your return type. Otherwise, it's just text to t
In struts 2 we already do that for you(link tag and button tag in the
ajax theme), this is the code to extract the javascript sections(from Dojo):
parse : function(s) {
this.log("Parsing: " + s);
var match = [];
var tmp = [];
var scripts = [];
while(match){
match = s.match(/]
20 matches
Mail list logo
