ystems LLC
> 3325 N. Nellis Blvd, #1
> Las Vegas, NV 89115
> Phone:(702)643-7425
> Fax:(520)844-1036
> *Note new email changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 1:32 PM
> To: S
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 1:32 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Shale <--> Struts 1.n
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:09:22 -0800, Michael Oliver wrote:
> Well Ted, Craig certainly wasn't singing that tune, although that
> doesn't mean you are wrong ei
llis Blvd, #1
> Las Vegas, NV 89115
> Phone:(702)643-7425
> Fax:(520)844-1036
> *Note new email changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:41 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:09:22 -0800, Michael Oliver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well Ted, Craig certainly wasn't singing that tune, although that
> doesn't mean you are wrong either.
Ted is obviously right. I am sure Craig is wholly in agreement with
this too, although maybe he would be hesitant
ing List
Subject: Re: Shale <--> Struts 1.n
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 09:44:43 -0800, Michael Oliver wrote:
> What are the plans for migration and/or interoperation for Shale
> and Struts 1.n?
There's been some talk on the dev list about using both frameworks
together, on a temporary basis,
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 09:44:43 -0800, Michael Oliver wrote:
> What are the plans for migration and/or interoperation for Shale
> and Struts 1.n?
There's been some talk on the dev list about using both frameworks together, on
a temporary basis, but it's not recommended.
It's a lot like asking what
6 matches
Mail list logo