Re: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-08 Thread Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
I don't think anyone is _threatened_ by RAD tools. To be a threat, they would have to be better than the alternatives And they're not I have yet to see a RAD (as in point and click programming) tool that is actually more productive taking the entire lifecycle of a development project into c

Re: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread Dave Newton
duane5...@hotmail.com wrote: The core features of the tool are -20X faster development compared to current market alternatives What do you believe the "current market alternatives" are? -90% point and click development(business rules must be coded) I find that *highly* unlikely, but perhaps

RE: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread Martin Gainty
a pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > From: duane5...@hotmail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: Re: Re [S2]

Re: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread duane5000
To the group: How threatened do you feel toward RAD tools? Do you feel that a RAD environment would take your 5 man team to a one-man team, or do you see (company-mentality) the 5 man team taking the company to market 5 times faster(overall SDLC) and seeing new projects( that appear out of reac

RE: Re [S2] development tool

2009-06-05 Thread Martin Gainty
this would address training only.. local training always works as the student pays before the class but then again a storm could come up and push class back or the training oom HVAC could go awry..things can go wrong to upset the schedule then again online is far 'iffier' because of man-in-the-