--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey Dave, to you care to comment?
Sure; might as well earn my pay today.
Oh, wait.
>> Do you know what the code would look like to get
the
>> id off the action?
AFAIK ModelDriven just pushes the model on to the top
of the stack, so the easiest would be to use the
Hey Dave, to you care to comment?
On 6/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alright! Now we are getting somewhere. Do you know what the code would
look like to get the id off the action?
Scott
On 6/25/07, Dave Newton < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Alright! Now we are getting somewhere. Do you know what the code would
look like to get the id off the action?
Scott
On 6/25/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
If you've implemented ModelDriven and it's returning
the payrollUpdate, then this would
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
If you've implemented ModelDriven and it's returning
the payrollUpdate, then this would be expected
behavior: ModelDriven puts the model on the stack so
its properties are available w/o prefixing.
d.
___
I have a PayrollAction class that extends BaseAction which has an id field.
PayrollAction also contains a bean that contains an id field. The id fields
are the Hibernate PKs. My BaseAction
extends ActionSupport implements SessionAware, ModelDriven, Preparable. I
have carefully observed the foll
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I call an action with an id=20 parameter and that
> action contains both a field called id and a bean
> that contains an id field, both fields are being set
> to 20. Does the parameter "setter" logic set
> everything on the action object hierarchy that it
can
>
6 matches
Mail list logo