age -
From: "Mick Wever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: FieldChecks change signature and no longer returns value
> > Gentoo now has the latest version.
> You're responsible for the ebuild? T
> Gentoo now has the latest version.
You're responsible for the ebuild? Thanks!
But doesn't build:
>>> Source unpacked.
Buildfile: build.xml does not exist!
Build failed
Mick.
--
--- "The reward of patience is patience." St. Augustine
http://www.harryspractice.com.au>Harry's Practice
---
--
Gentoo now has the latest version.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Mick Wever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: FieldChecks change signature and no longer returns value
> > Version 1.2.2 was
> Version 1.2.2 was downgraded from "ga" quality because of problems so its
> not a good idea to use it in general. Current release version is 1.2.4 and
> this issue was fixed in that version.
Sorry, failed to look that far ahead :$
Gentoo, unfortunately is still publishing 1.2.2 :(
> P.S. I ass
> After updating to version 1.2.2
> FieldsCheck.validateInteger(..) now returns a boolean indicating success
> rather the value. This has broken our code and we need the value. Is
> there a substitute method now?
I've tracked this down to a patch done under bug#26413.
http://issues.apache.org/bug
Version 1.2.2 was downgraded from "ga" quality because of problems so its
not a good idea to use it in general. Current release version is 1.2.4 and
this issue was fixed in that version.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26413
Niall
P.S. I assume you meant FieldsCheck.validateInt
6 matches
Mail list logo