PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Design issue
Hi,
I usually access my cached droplist data directly from the jsp - eg have
placed a bean called "ReferenceDataCache" on application scope with
getter methods. In jsp I can simply call:
I also try to keep my struts
I didn't see a case where (2) is better.
Ideas from other folks? Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Information Guzzler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 6:32 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Design issue
Definitely (1) if you are strictly foll
Hi,
I usually access my cached droplist data directly from the jsp - eg have placed
a bean called "ReferenceDataCache" on application scope with getter methods. In
jsp I can simply call:
I also try to keep my struts forms only containing properties for the http
posted data.
The co
Definitely (1) if you are strictly following MVC.
Is there any specific scenario wherein (2) seems good to you? If there is
then explore ways to force it thro' controller
On 2/2/07, Zhang, Larry (L.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Think about a typical struts app, and on the jsp there are text f
tag look at the "validate"
attribute in the config?
Scott Mulligan
-Original Message-
From: Angelo zerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:47 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: - Design Issue with Struts Validation
Hi,
Me, I use DispatchAction, and
On 5/16/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remember the days when newsgroups had a daily or weekly FAQ posting?
Whaddya think?
We have wiki now. (I believe that wiki needs a bit of reorganization)
* Any more or less important/frequent issues should be reflected in
wiki. I believe tha
?
Scott Mulligan
-Original Message-
From: Angelo zerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:47 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: - Design Issue with Struts Validation
Hi,
Me, I use DispatchAction, and I prefer call validate in my action,
inst
Chaudhary, Harsh wrote:
> I would go with the declarative approach. It lends to more flexibility.
>
Not really.
If I'm doing something the exact same way every time I'd much rather
handle it by implementing a method (that you'd have to implement anyway)
and not bother with a config file change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> If we are speaking of the real "FAQ" i can contribute ;-) Have some cool
>> links of you guys here...
>
> Sounds like a Wiki to me :) There is a page for Struts FAQs (probably
> more than one) already on the Wiki. Go to it, I'm certain everyone w
On Tue, May 16, 2006 3:19 pm, C. Grobmeier wrote:
> Good idea. But i think Dave is speaking of a FAQ which is not just
> summing up what happened this week on the struts list, but he is
> speaking of a "real" FAQ, with the most important links (to the wiki) etc.
>
> If we are speaking of the real "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Remember the days when newsgroups had a daily or weekly FAQ posting?
>>
>> Whaddya think?
>>
>
> Not a bad idea, but someone would have to put it together each week. You
> voluntering? :) It would work if you simply put it together and poste
I would go with the declarative approach. It lends to more flexibility.
Harsh.
-Original Message-
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:27 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: - Design Issue with Struts
On Tue, May 16, 2006 2:02 pm, Dave Newton wrote:
> Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
>> Create two different mappings, one for the initial view (which has
>> validate set to false), one for the submission (with validate set to
>> true).
>>
>
> Create a base action that has separate handlers for GET (initial
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> Create two different mappings, one for the initial view (which has
> validate set to false), one for the submission (with validate set to
> true).
>
Create a base action that has separate handlers for GET (initial page
hit) and POST (form submission).
Remember the d
Hi,
Me, I use DispatchAction, and I prefer call validate in my action, instead
of struts launch automaticaly validate (validate="true" in action). So in my
struts-config, I have just one mapping for an action (I set
validate="false"). After in my dispatchAction I design my DispatchAction
with sev
Hi,
Create two different mappings, one for the initial view (which has
validate set to false), one for the submission (with validate set to
true).
Frank
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EM
esday, May 25, 2004 3:09 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Cc: 'Dhanesh Vasandani'
Subject: RE: Design Issue - Unchanged data getting submitted
Hi,
Update record problem:
I assume that you have a Header record and multiple child records for this
header. To ensure that only t
Hi,
Update record problem:
I assume that you have a Header record and multiple child records for this
header. To ensure that only the changed records are saved you will have to
mark them as "Changed" from the UI. And pass only the changed ones to
Business Layer so that only changed ones are saved
I assume your using BMP for persistence. If so, then you
could implement a Store Optimization (Dirty Marker) Strategy
which would control which fields get updated.
For CMP, the container should manage this.
For more on this strategy:
http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns/Patterns/Compos
Hi Brad,
I've used the iframe solution on a project, as well. It worked for me.
However, I think there are some drawbacks. You loose visual control over what's going
on in the hidden iframe. I loaded .jsp into the iframe that wouldn't even compile and
didn't notice, because I didn't see the com
D]
Sent: 12 May 2004 14:49
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Design Issue/Question
We use this solutions quite a bit... in fact we have the form in a hidden
iframe which the user does not see but appears for developers for debbuging
purposes.. when the action completes javascrip
The way i've done it, i have an iframe with 0 width/height, and load a url
into it. e.g.
iframe1.location='additem.do?code=item1';
Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: Nimmons, Buster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 May 2004 14:49
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
selection was saved (or not in case of error) this has worked extremely well
for us
-Original Message-
From: Brad Balmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:47 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Design Issue/Question
So I would create a frame on my page that
So I would create a frame on my page that has a form with the action
that I need to call? Then my javascript (onclick) would just reference
the new frame and call the submit on the frame?
Is this correct? If so, by submitting the frame there would be no
perceived effect on the page that the c
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 22:37, Daniel Perry wrote:
> I've done similar things before.
> Use javascript to open an action to add it to the database. This can be in
> a new window, in another frame, or in a hidden iframe!
I'm pretty sure you could do it using divs aswell, the dynapi(a cross
plat
I've done similar things before.
Use javascript to open an action to add it to the database. This can be in
a new window, in another frame, or in a hidden iframe!
Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: Brad Balmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 May 2004 13:46
To: Struts Users Mailing List
26 matches
Mail list logo
