Preciously!..what you said about changing form is exactly what I was thinking.
From: Dave Newton
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:35:50 PM
Subject: Re: Custom validation interceptor
Peter Bliznak wrote:
> It is across entire
Peter Bliznak wrote:
It is across entire app (there are many dozen of actions) - every
single action has to have same behavior - 3 crosses go and try again.
It's app for changing personal info on government issued documents -
sorta wizard like thing. I can see how I can do it by keeping eye of
p
t: Re: Custom validation interceptor
Peter Bliznak wrote:
> I have following requirement: If validation of the page fails 3 times
> in row - invalidate session and redirect to index page. Should I
> replace default validation interceptor in default stack with my own
> to achieve what I am a
Peter Bliznak wrote:
I have following requirement: If validation of the page fails 3 times
in row - invalidate session and redirect to index page. Should I
replace default validation interceptor in default stack with my own
to achieve what I am after? I there any other way?
Is this across the e
I don't think a custom interceptor is required. You could probably get
this done through hidden parameters or by storing attempts in the
session or something. Do you have this req for one action or all
actions in the app?
On 6/20/09, Peter Bliznak wrote:
> Hi,
> I have following requirement:
> If
The OP isn't really using the built-in intrange validator, but doing it
manually (for some reason).
The problem, however, lies in the OP's configuration fragment:
WTT_CARDS_EDITOR
def_page_employee_card
def_page_employee_card
As soon as you start defining an action's inter
If Integer Range Validator does not work for you then you shoud consider
regular expression validation for same, its can be done by restricting
number of digits and allowing only numeric characters.
Here is an example of similar problem
http://struts-2-developers.blogspot.com/2008/08/struts-2-in
Lukasz Lenart wrote:
I'm not sure were is the problem but I've just checked such simple
example below and everything is ok. Maybe you should consider to use
Long instead of Integer, because when you enter more then 2147483647
to the field you will get some strange value back to the input
(because
I'm not sure were is the problem but I've just checked such simple
example below and everything is ok. Maybe you should consider to use
Long instead of Integer, because when you enter more then 2147483647
to the field you will get some strange value back to the input
(because you loose precision ;-
return response;
}
public void setResponse(HttpServletResponse response) {
this.response = response;
}
public int getFieldName() {
return fieldName;
}
public void setFieldName(int fieldName) {
> request = ServletActionContext.getRequest();
> String tmp = "";
> try {
>tmp = request.getParameter("cardNo");
>Integer i = this.getCardNo();
>if (tmp != null && tmp.length() > 0) {
>
From: Puneet Lakhina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I said:
> > There are any number of ways around this; creating another action
> > mapping (perhaps just a forward) is one way.
> Forward wont do I need to get things from a DB before displaying the
page.
Obviously that won't work then.
> > Turning
On 10/10/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Puneet Lakhina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is this the wrong way of doing things??
"Wrong" seems a bit strong.
There are any number of ways around this; creating another action
mapping (perhaps just a forward) is one way.
Forward w
> From: Puneet Lakhina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is this the wrong way of doing things??
"Wrong" seems a bit strong.
There are any number of ways around this; creating another action
mapping (perhaps just a forward) is one way. Turning off automatic
validation and running it manually (for inst
14 matches
Mail list logo
