Hi again,
just to clarify,
i'm talking about reset method inside any form that is a subclass of
this one below:
http://struts.apache.org/1.x/apidocs/org/apache/struts/action/ActionForm.html#reset(org.apache.struts.action.ActionMapping,
javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest)
and on every request t
thanks Pawel for the help.. in the previous mail you told me about
configuring. So i was just going through my struts-config file where i saw
that i didnt specified the scope in the action mapping. Then i realized that
reset is called whenever there is a new session, which means by default the
sco
Hi,
i was thinking about redirect scenario where You load some page
through a redirect so there are two actions involved,
and after redirect only one action is called. But that's just a wild
guesing, so please send struts-config.xml and the action that You are
reffering and form, so maybe i or some
well all the points you said is ok for me the only thing i dont know about is
the configuration. What kind of configuration you are talking about?
Actually i am quite new to struts and so may be i dont know about some
in-depth concepts.
Paweł Wielgus wrote:
>
> Hi,
> if it's not browser fault,
In the time between the first time you go to the page and the second time
where in your application is the data supposed to be?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Paweł Wielgus
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Sent: Fri, Aug 28, 2009 5:34 am
Subject: Re: ActionForm is been
Hi,
if it's not browser fault,
then maybe configuration,
are You dealing with redirect in this case?
Or maybe You have some king of logic inside form's reset method.
One another thing is action beeing defined twice with two different forms?
Other than that i don't know,
reset works always for me.
well i applied break points on both "actionform" and "action" of the form and
did both refresh and brand new request. It is been caught in both the times
with the break point in the action but not in the actionform
Paweł Wielgus wrote:
>
> Hi,
> what do You mean by saying:
> "if i try to open th
Hi,
what do You mean by saying:
"if i try to open the page again"
what does that mean for real?
hitting F5 or refresh button in browser?
or a real brand new request.
Best greetings,
Paweł Wielgus.
2009/8/28 sharadsingh :
>
> i have an action form which i use to collect form data and also to set
It lives in whatever scope you tell it :-) There is a scope parameter on the
action tag. It defaults to session.
Objects persist until the holder is thrownaway. For requests, objects in
request scope are thrown out when the request is thrown out. Objects in the
session are thrown out when the ses
Assuming Struts 1.x, Action Forms are null when the "name" attribute,
which specifies the form, is omitted. Forms are optional for actions.
Paul
Dave Newton wrote:
I'm glad you fixed your problem.
--- Monkeyden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I knew exactly what to tell you, I would likely
kno
I'm glad you fixed your problem.
--- Monkeyden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I knew exactly what to tell you, I would likely
> know enough to fix it.
Most people seem to find that posting relevent
portions of the config file(s) in question and
isolated code chunks to be a reasonable place to
st
If I knew exactly what to tell you, I would likely know enough to fix it.
Turns out I did. The root cause of the problem, and the solution, had
nothing todo with Struts.
On 2/25/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Monkeyden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im using Struts 1.2.9 on Tomca
--- Monkeyden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im using Struts 1.2.9 on Tomcat 4.1.31. Somehow, my
> form is null within my Action.
That's not much to go on.
d.
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A f
Raghuveer wrote:
Can we send ActionForm as argument to a method in DAO class from Action
Class.
Can you? yes. Should you? almost certainly not.
What is Best Practice ?
You should keep your model decoupled from your view. Passing Struts
artifacts like action forms into the data access layer
If your page is read-only, then you are a lucky bastard ;-) and can
use whatever you want. Strictly speaking, you you do not have to use
ActionForm at all. I personally believe that the only value of
ActionForm class is when it is combined with tag and you
build data entry form. This is why?
Say
That's how I do it most of the time. If your POJO is in session
scope, your Action won't even have to do anything.
I usually only use ActionForm when there's a corresponding HTML
. If I'm just displaying data on the page, I just pass the
POJO.
Hubert
On 7/18/06, Mississippi John Hurt <[EMAIL
But what if my jsp page that I want to display the DAO info is a read only
page ie. doesn't have an element on it? Would I still populate
the ActionForm and use it to display or would I just pass a regular POJO to
jsp and use or jsp or scriptlet to display?
On 7/18/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAI
On 7/18/06, Mississippi John Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I know ActionForm can be used to transfer html-form-input-fields to the
Action class. But what about the other way around? Can it be used to say get
a DAO object and transfer its properties to the ActionForm, which when the
request
On Thu, June 8, 2006 3:07 pm, Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> So your argument is basically that database roundtrips will degrade
> performance.
Yes, but that's only one aspect of it... scalability is also a factor, as
is number of breakage point, as is cost, because to overcome the first two
you have
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> Check out Stripes, great stuff.
It is indeed pretty cool.
I really dislike putting my URL mappings in code, though, if for no
other reason than if I'm testing or need to stub out a URL handler
temporarily for some reason I have to touch things in two different
places (m
On Thu, June 8, 2006 2:46 pm, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> Always slow to get on the latest bandwagon, eh Frank :-)
Who, what, me?!? Nhh!
(hey, you were the last Ant vs. Maven holdout, I was happy I wasn't the
only one... you left me man!! LOL)
> That being said, XML configuration fil
On 6/8/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/8/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Annotations are not a good idea when the configuration concept should
not be a concern of the person actually writing the code. In webapps, for
example, I don't believe in conf
On 6/8/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, June 8, 2006 2:12 pm, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> * Enhance the user experience by catching errors as quickly
> as possible (ideally client side in a webapp), with error messages that
> are relevant to the user's context in that pa
On 6/8/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I'm still not sold on the whole concept of annotations myself... it seems
to encourage scattering things throughout the code base that otherwise
would be centralized.
Always slow to get on the latest bandwagon, eh Frank :-)
Ironi
On Thu, June 8, 2006 2:12 pm, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> IMHO, where and how to do what kinds of validations is going to be the
> next
> "great debate" in application framework design :-)
Hehe, it's a debate that's been around for a while, not sure it can be the
"next" great debate :) LOL
> * Enha
On 6/8/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> On Thu, June 8, 2006 1:09 pm, Michael Jouravlev wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, the whole idea of Struts/Commons Validator sucks
>> big time, because database already has all necessary validations,
>> domains, triggers,
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> On Thu, June 8, 2006 1:09 pm, Michael Jouravlev wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, the whole idea of Struts/Commons Validator sucks
>> big time, because database already has all necessary validations,
>> domains, triggers, etc. Since most apps use database anyway, input
>>
On Thu, June 8, 2006 1:09 pm, Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> On the other hand, the whole idea of Struts/Commons Validator sucks
> big time, because database already has all necessary validations,
> domains, triggers, etc. Since most apps use database anyway, input
> data should either be validated dir
On 6/8/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Second, an ActionForm is, usually, used to repopulate an HTML form on a
page when an error occurs, or when a page is initially shown. Since HTML
forms only deal in Strings, another recommendation you frequently hear is
to only have Strings
On 6/8/06, chamal desilva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I read few articles on struts. They recommend not to
send action form class to EJBs as data holders. They
recommend we should use general classes for holding
data to decople web tier with EJBs.
What they say must be correct but I still ha
chamal desilva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read few articles on struts. They recommend not to
> send action form class to EJBs as data holders. They
> recommend we should use general classes for holding
> data to decople web tier with EJBs.
>
That's right.
> What they say must be correct but I still have
Hi Chamal,
The recommendation of not passing ActionForms to your business classes
stems from two thoughts...
First, by passing an ActionForm, you tie your business clases to Struts.
Should you want to change to another framework later, your business
classes should be unaffected, therefore, passi
Not really. People do use it that way, but it is really meant to be a
buffer for the input to a form. We need a place to store values so
that we can validate the input. After the input is validated, it is
usually transfered to a value object and that object is passed to the
business layer. Essentia
Raghuveer wrote:
Is there a way to restrict the call to validate method.
In below example "manageaccount.jsp" will be loaded initially by calling
"ManageLoad.do" action mapping.
validate=false is set as i dont need and validation when page loads first
time.
But later when i submit the form ,i
ah, ok, well thanks, that was rather illuminating :)
thanks a thousand
Julian
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: "Struts Users Mailing List"
> Betreff: Re: ActionForm Stringvariables
> Datum: Thu,
; Von: "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: "Struts Users Mailing List"
> > Betreff: Re: ActionForm Stringvariables
> > Datum: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:06:50 +0100
> >
> > 1. The general rule is: never use null.
> > 2. The specific r
OTECTED]>
> An: "Struts Users Mailing List"
> Betreff: Re: ActionForm Stringvariables
> Datum: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:06:50 +0100
>
> 1. The general rule is: never use null.
> 2. The specific rule for your application must be given by your
> application, but in doub
1. The general rule is: never use null.
2. The specific rule for your application must be given by your
application, but in doubt the general rule applies.
regards
leon
On 3/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm a newbie to struts and I have a question concerning
The FormDef version that has built-in support for nested beans
actually requires Struts 1.2.7 or higher.
I'm not aware of a "concise document" that covers what you're asking.
However, there are upgrade notes you can check for upgrading from 1.1
to 1.2.4, then from 1.2.4 to 1.2.7 [1]. There's not
Joe Germuska wrote:
> Check out FormDef: https://formdef.dev.java.net/
> I haven't actually had need to apply it, but I believe its intention
> matches your use case.
I did take an initial look at it, but I missed the details about nested
beans. It does seem to map to what I want to accomplish.
At 11:03 PM -0600 3/7/06, news.gmane.org wrote:
What are the recommendations for dealing with ActionForms that contain or
represent complex nested data structures, preferrably using JavaBeans that
already exist within the application?
Check out FormDef: https://formdef.dev.java.net/
I haven't
On 3/7/06, news.gmane.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What are the recommendations for dealing with ActionForms that contain or
> represent complex nested data structures, preferrably using JavaBeans that
> already exist within the application?
In addition to understanding current design pat
Hans,
You're using request scope for your form. When Struts processes the
submitted form, it will create a new instance of your ActionForm. The
question now is, is the new instance ready to deal with setting values
on your ArrayList field? Struts will not instantiate that list for
you, it would
On 2/14/06, Marcio Ghiraldelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working with a dyanmic form, that generates n checkboxes (for each
> row of my set).
>
> Using a String[] type in the action form, I´d been able to retrieve the
> data. Now, I´m trying to pre-populate these ch
Scott Vickery wrote:
I know this is a bit open-ended, but, here is goes. I have a somewhat
complicated form. It is the classic Order / OrderLine problem. I have
an order, within it, there is >1 order lines. The order lines are
arranged as a tree so that they can be grouped together by the use
If the validate method returs non empty ActionErrors object, the control
will go to the JSP specified in the input attribute of the corresponding
action element in struts-config.xml .
Thanks,
Rajasekhar Cherukuri
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing Li
ok got it
thanks
On 10/6/05, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Michael Jouravlev wrote:
>
> > element has "input" attribute, which contains path, where
> >browser will be forwarded if validate() returns non-null non-empty
> >collection. Usually it is the same page that you just submitte
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
element has "input" attribute, which contains path, where
browser will be forwarded if validate() returns non-null non-empty
collection. Usually it is the same page that you just submitted.
Action's execute() method is not called at all.
That's what I meant.
I have
On 10/6/05, Nishant Deshpande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When my ActionForm returns a non-empty ActionErrors object, where does
> control go to?
>
> I guess I don't understand what 'corresponding input form' means? Presumably
> the controller needs to call some Action, how do I know / specify whi
Nishant Deshpande wrote:
I guess I don't understand what 'corresponding input form' means? Presumably
the controller needs to call some Action, how do I know / specify which one?
The action that called the validation is executed with a GET request.
(More or less.)
Dave
-
You're not seeing any data in your action because your JSP doesn't
contain anything that would submit data. You have a form in your JSP,
but no input elements: all your data is just written to the page as
static text.
If you want a form to submit data, that form needs to include HTML input
el
at the whole you need a DTO(Data Transfer Object) for transferring the student
fetched data to the jsp page. So you could specify an object for this purpose
or use your predefine actionForm object.
you could use bean:write for both specified DTO and ActionForm object to
display the information
Balkan,
The values retrieved from the database don't need to be put into an
ActionForm. Just put the collection or bean as a session or request
attribute in your Action class, forward to your second page, and then
retrieve the values and display them. There is no need to have an
ActionForm ass
Balkan Guler schrieb:
>Hello.
> There is something I could not understand with actionForms.
> Suppose that I have 2 pages and a action.
>In first page I want to take student number and call the business objects in
>action to fetch the student details from database and show them in the
>second p
Shekhar Jain wrote the following on 7/26/2005 1:19 PM:
I have an ActionForm with a List of beans with a variable size. In my
reset() method I'm trying to resize the List to the size I need.
You really shouldn't have to do this. It's much easier to just wrap your
list in a LazyList. More info
On 7/4/05, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> My form has some boolean properties and I set them to false in the
> reset method. The Action that handles the form has redirect attribute
> as true, i.e if there is an error, it redirects to the same page that
> has the form with errors. When it
Try putting in some logic where ever you are assigning the value... like if
it is not set then set it to false... if it is already set don't touch it!
HTH
Nitesh
-Original Message-
From: Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 1:05 PM
To: Struts
Subject: ActionForm rese
ers Mailing List"
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: ActionForm losing Collection/Map property on forward
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:58:34 +0100
Silly question, but it probably needs asking; What scope are you giving this
form? I assume it is request.
I know it is unfashion
Silly question, but it probably needs asking; What scope are you giving this
form? I assume it is request.
I know it is unfashionable, but giving the form a scope of session will
persist this HashMap for you (unless you reset it).
Cheers
Christopher Marsh-Bourdon
www.marsh-bourdon.com
---
hi,
if u want to prepopulate the form from form then the proper place is
constructor but remember 2nd time u wouldn't get the form populated as
to resuse the form actionservelet call the reset method befor resuing
any existing form. so u can place same code into the reset method.
the best way is
So where is the proper place to prepopulate fields? [I know I am a noob]
On 6/8/05, Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. Is this causing a problem for you? Please note that reset() is
> not where you should be prepopulating fields. As it says in the
> javadoc:
>
> "In practice, the
Yes. Is this causing a problem for you? Please note that reset() is
not where you should be prepopulating fields. As it says in the
javadoc:
"In practice, the only properties that need to be reset are those
which represent checkboxes on a session-scoped form."
... and ...
"You mainly need to
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Fair point, at least as far as params go :) I never noticed the
getParameterMap() method to be honest.
The wonders of an API larger than... well, something Really Big. I
didn't know it was there either until today when I thought to myself
"nobody's ever written that b
Fair point, at least as far as params go :) I never noticed the
getParameterMap() method to be honest.
The methods in RequestUtils (and the one in SessionUtils) came from the
fact that during debugging I (and I think most of us) have a need to
easily see what's coming in with a request. So, I wi
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Alternatively, you could use the Commons Servlet packages'
getRequestParameter(), getRequestHeaders() and getRequestAttributes()
methods of the RequestUtils class, and if you need it there is also a
getSessionAttributes() method in SessionUtils (I know because I added
a
Alternatively, you could use the Commons Servlet packages'
getRequestParameter(), getRequestHeaders() and getRequestAttributes()
methods of the RequestUtils class, and if you need it there is also a
getSessionAttributes() method in SessionUtils (I know because I added
all four!)
http://svn.apa
From: "rmanchu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> anyone know what is the key under which the actionform is stored within
> a request?
>
It's under whatever name (as in ) you configured in
struts-config.xml.
Here's the "debug.jsp" that I include at the bottom of my main layout page
during development. It
Props to Rick as well. You were dead on.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Reumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 9:42 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: ActionForm problem
Just curious, is your boolean getter autogenerated? It might be set up as
Props to Rick as well. You were dead on.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Reumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 9:42 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: ActionForm problem
Just curious, is your boolean getter autogenerated? It might be set up as
input, y'all. It is all helpful to a guy who is
still pretty new at this stuff.
Hyrum
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:54 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: ActionForm problem
Did you change the types on both the gett
input, y'all. It is all helpful to a guy who is
still pretty new at this stuff.
Hyrum
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:54 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: ActionForm problem
Did you change the types on both the gett
Just curious, is your boolean getter autogenerated? It might be set up as
isSsnOnFile
which will work fine for booleans, but when you change to String it
needs to find getSsnOnFile. My guess is maybe you changed the type but
didn't change the syntax of the getter?
Hyrum wrote the following on 3/
Did you change the types on both the getter and the setter methods?
Did you keep a setter with the boolean type? I don't remember all of
the details, but I don't think that the following is a valid bean
property:
public String getSsnOnFile() { return ssnOnFile ? "Y" : "N"; }
public void setS
I would still like to know what the root problem is here, the tag thing
aside. Why can't the ValidatorActionForm see my value "ssnOnFile" when I
change the type from boolean to String?? Just for future reference, anyone
have any ideas??
-Original Message-
From: Hyrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
I would still like to know what the root problem is here, the tag thing
aside. Why can't the ValidatorActionForm see my value "ssnOnFile" when I
change the type from boolean to String?? Just for future reference, anyone
have any ideas??
-Original Message-
From: Hyrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Leon Rosenberg wrote the following on 3/17/2005 5:37 PM:
Actually I was saying the opposite :-) EL makes your page looking
"uglier"...
I mean, you can write
${bean.boolProp?'Yes, I am an idiot':'No, not an idiot'}
Or
<% bean.boolProp?"Yes, I am an idiot":"No, not an idiot" %>
I think the idea of
You want to validate your input anyway. If user puts in
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:03:16 -0700, Hyrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ${bean.isIdiot ? "Yes, I'm an Idiot" : "No, I'm not an Idiot"}
>
This doesn't suffer from the dangerious content problem, because you
don't actually *emit* the contents of the isIdiot property -- you only
use it on the ser
I guess these things depend on sentiments that are not obvious. I
definitely like the wrote:
> So, if not using ugly, and I don't want wicked users inserting script tags, am I stuck with
> the original somewhere. The choose method works, but is there a better way? If you
> wanna talk about ug
So, if not using
Yes, I'm an Idiot
No, I'm not an Idiot
Is WAY uglier than
${bean.isIdiot ? "Yes, I'm an Idiot" : "No, I'm not an Idiot"}
even if the ugly way is safer. But that's just personal preference.
So, if not using
Yes, I'm an Idiot
No, I'm not an Idiot
Is WAY uglier than
${bean.isIdiot ? "Yes, I'm an Idiot" : "No, I'm not an Idiot"}
even if the ugly way is safer. But that's just personal preference.
>
> > I asked for an example where you actually need EL -> can't
> achieve the
> > same with (standard) tags.
>
> Oh, ok. No, you are right, all the EL expressions do is make
> my page look a little cleaner vs using c:out. Not that big of
> a deal I guess, however they are nice for certain th
>
> > I asked for an example where you actually need EL -> can't
> achieve the
> > same with (standard) tags.
>
> Oh, ok. No, you are right, all the EL expressions do is make
> my page look a little cleaner vs using c:out. Not that big of
> a deal I guess, however they are nice for certain th
Leon Rosenberg wrote the following on 3/17/2005 5:10 PM:
I asked for an example where you actually need EL -> can't achieve the same
with (standard) tags.
Oh, ok. No, you are right, all the EL expressions do is make my page
look a little cleaner vs using c:out. Not that big of a deal I guess,
how
> Not sure what you mean by the above the question and No, I'm
> not going to use XSLT:) XSTL is nice, but no way it's as easy
> to use as EL expressions in JSP. When I know I'm only going
> to be using JSP, EL is my friend.
I asked for an example where you actually need EL -> can't achieve the
> Not sure what you mean by the above the question and No, I'm
> not going to use XSLT:) XSTL is nice, but no way it's as easy
> to use as EL expressions in JSP. When I know I'm only going
> to be using JSP, EL is my friend.
I asked for an example where you actually need EL -> can't achieve the
Craig McClanahan wrote the following on 3/17/2005 4:22 PM:
The unsuspecting user who displays this page will be executing
whatever JavaScript code replaces "...". That doesn't happen if you
use (or in Struts) because, by default, the "<"
character gets emitted as "<" instead.
Very interesting. T
Leon Rosenberg wrote the following on 3/17/2005 4:22 PM:
Now really, is there a case where you actually _need_ JSTL / EL
functionality in
an MVC conform jsp?
Not sure what you mean by the above the question and No, I'm not going
to use XSLT:) XSTL is nice, but no way it's as easy to use as EL
e
> Expression evaluation doesn't filter out characters that are
> sensitive in HTML (like '<'). Consider a common case where
> you accept input from a user into a text field, store it in
> your database, and then display it (on a different page) with
> something like this:
>
> ${customer.n
> Expression evaluation doesn't filter out characters that are
> sensitive in HTML (like '<'). Consider a common case where
> you accept input from a user into a text field, store it in
> your database, and then display it (on a different page) with
> something like this:
>
> ${customer.n
Thanks, Craig, and thereyougo, Rick.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:22:41 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:18:25 -0500, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dakota Jack wrote the following on 3/17/2005 4:08 PM:
> > > I think that Craig had mentioned that
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:18:25 -0500, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dakota Jack wrote the following on 3/17/2005 4:08 PM:
> > I think that Craig had mentioned that there were some security issues
> > or something, however, with not using the > bother checking it out because I still use t
Dakota Jack wrote the following on 3/17/2005 4:08 PM:
I think that Craig had mentioned that there were some security issues
or something, however, with not using the wow, really? I'd like to know what they are. I love how much cleaner my
code is without having to use c:out everywhere.
--
Rick
---
I think that Craig had mentioned that there were some security issues
or something, however, with not using the wrote:
> Hyrum wrote the following on 3/17/2005 3:48 PM:
>
> >
>
> No, with Tomcat5.0 you dont' need the c:out just do:
>
> ${manageFilerForm.ssnOnFile?'Y':'N'}
>
>
> --
> Rick
>
Hyrum wrote the following on 3/17/2005 3:48 PM:
No, with Tomcat5.0 you dont' need the c:out just do:
${manageFilerForm.ssnOnFile?'Y':'N'}
--
Rick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
t;", "lt", "==", "eq", "<=", "le", ">=", "ge", "!=",
"ne", "[", "+", "-", "*", "/", "div", "%", "mod", "and
t;", "lt", "==", "eq", "<=", "le", ">=", "ge", "!=",
"ne", "[", "+", "-", "*", "/", "div", "%", "mod", "and
Hyrum wrote the following on 3/17/2005 2:56 PM:
I have successfully populated a jsp with items from a ValidatorActionForm.
One of the properties is a boolean, and it is printing the word "true" on my
page, where I want a 'Y' or 'N'. So I changed the ValidatorForm so that the
property is a string.
ase share them.
>
> Also, how well does Xdoclet work with dyna forms?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:49 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: ActionForm vs. DynaActionForm
>
&g
Hubert Rabago wrote:
That would only get you an object to hold values, right? You'd still
need to put validation rules somewhere. With an ActionForm, its
validate() method should contain this. Of course, it could delegate
it somewhere, but you'd be maintaining that, instead.
I assume you mea
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
