l! If I didn't know about filters or hadn't thought of it you would
have done me a service informing me, so it's all good as far as I'm concerned :)
> Paul
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 2
> Lord, Frank --- no worries. One of the worst things is people who
> take things too seriously and read jots and tiddles on these lists.
> Relax with me. Sounds like therapy? LOL ;-)
Therapy... I could use that :)
> I did not mean that it was in the response object but accessed within
> the
4:41
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Accessing my form from an included page
>
>
> On Thu, December 23, 2004 9:13 am, Donie Kelly said:
> > [Donie Kelly] Hi Guys
> >
> > OK, I ran through most of what your are telling me and must
> first
nder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
> Paul
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 23 December 2004 14:27
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Accessing my form f
7;t know. Check the group archives
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&r=1&w=2) - breadcrumbs have
come up before.
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Donie Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 December 2004 14:14
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subj
On Thu, December 23, 2004 9:13 am, Donie Kelly said:
> [Donie Kelly] Hi Guys
>
> OK, I ran through most of what your are telling me and must first thank
> you
> all for the detailed responses.
You spawned an interesting thread! The seemingly simple questions are usually
the ones that do that th
e mapping in an attribute whose name
you define?
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 December 2004 14:27
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Accessing my form from an included page
>
>
> That's what on
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:29:31 -, Paul McCulloch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you execute an action the name of the action from used is set in a
> request scope attribute "org.apache.struts.action.mapping.instance". It's a
> fairly simple matter to get the actual actionform object if you kno
That's what one of my solutions was too, although I wasn't 100% sure the
mapping instance was actually in request (I thought I remembered seeing it, but
wasn't sure).
The argument against doing that though is that the attribute name could
conceivably be changed down the road, breaking your code
[Donie Kelly] Hi Guys
OK, I ran through most of what your are telling me and must first thank you
all for the detailed responses.
I'm sure I need to explain my case a bit more clearly and please let me know
if what I am trying to do is easier if I take some other approach as I'm new
to struts.
1
When you execute an action the name of the action from used is set in a
request scope attribute "org.apache.struts.action.mapping.instance". It's a
fairly simple matter to get the actual actionform object if you know the
scope. For instance, all my forms are session scope so I can get the
just-used
See within:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:16:57 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
> > Frank,
> >
> > Donie is getting more than was planned for out of us.
>
> We're like that Scottrade dude that builds the log cabin for his buddies
> in that commercial :)
>
Dakota Jack wrote:
Frank,
Donie is getting more than was planned for out of us.
We're like that Scottrade dude that builds the log cabin for his buddies
in that commercial :)
Before I go any further, let me be sure you understand something... If
anything I say comes across like I'm talking do
Frank,
Donie is getting more than was planned for out of us.
First, to be fair to Donie, the answer to his problem is clear. We
are discussing somethings that are unnecessarily far afield. A
servlet can clearly know its own name. And, since the servlet creates
the response object and the htm
On Wed, December 22, 2004 1:56 pm, Dakota Jack said:
> Plasma TV? Not a new copy of Java Today? LOL ;-)
No self-respecting geek would choose the magazine! :)
(self-respecting geek... talk about an oxymoron!)
> The form has a name from the mapping. Whatever servlet, html, etc.
> you have is g
Plasma TV? Not a new copy of Java Today? LOL ;-)
The form has a name from the mapping. Whatever servlet, html, etc.
you have is going to reflect that form, right? What you want to do is
manage the RESPONSE not the REQUEST, right? The form is not in the
request but in the response.
The heade
Yes, if the enjoyment I cause my wo-workers was worth money, I'd be a rich man
indeed. My wife would have her new car and I'd have my 60-inch plasma TV. Oh
well, back to reality :(
The way I read the original post is that he wanted to have some common code in
header.jsp access the form associ
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:38:39 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> (Caveat: I may be wrong about all this :) )
>
> Frank W. Zammetti
> Founder and Chief Software Architect
> Omnytex Technologies
> http://www.omnytex.com
Frank, you are a hoot. ;-) You must be great to have as a work partner.
I
Since the form you'd need to retrieve is named depending on the main page
content, you won't know that information in the header (not easily anyway).
I mean, think of it this way... when your page is converted to a servlet, the
header code is included in with the main page, and then the footer,
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:59:04 -, Donie Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have the following jsp layout for my pages
>
> Included header.jsp
>
> STRUTS PAGE
>
> Included footer.jsp
>
> Now in the header.jsp I have my site logo and I also want to add
> breadcrumbs. I want to est
20 matches
Mail list logo
