Re: [Shale] #{managed-bean-name} always returns 0

2005-12-02 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Yeah I agree, I will try to give some help but I need to experiment Clay more deeply. It's quite complex at first! On 12/2/05, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Like the title says, #{managed-bean-name} is always evaluated to 0. > > Any idea why? > > The new syntax is [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Shale] #{managed-bean-name} always returns 0

2005-12-02 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Ok I finally found why. Now you have to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] because it is a symbol. I hope this can help some other people. On 12/2/05, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like the title says, #{managed-bean-name} is always evaluated to 0. > Any idea why? > -- > Alexandre Poitras > Qu

Re: [Shale] #{managed-bean-name} always returns 0

2005-12-02 Thread Gary VanMatre
> Like the title says, #{managed-bean-name} is always evaluated to 0. > Any idea why? The new syntax is [EMAIL PROTECTED] This was changed to be consistent with the other symbols. All symbols must be prefixed with an @. The documentation doesn't reflect this yet. > -- > Alexandre Poitras