Nope, we are drinking the Kool-aide here and converting ev-er-y-thing
(Lock, Stock, and Barrel) to M$ "technology".
That is what happens when former M$ execs migrate into the real world
and are allowed to make decisions.
Larry
On 6/29/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I suspect
Yan Hu wrote:
If Apache web server takes 60% where did the 40% go? IIS right? I think other
web servers are
almost negoligiable.
I responded to your comment that "Linux has never had more than 30% of
the server market" by stating my belief that I thought the poster was
referring to web ser
> I suspect a large portion of those apache boxen are running
> Solaris and BSD as well as linux, but some shops (here for
> instance) do run apache on Winblows. Of course, we have an
> AS/400, too. :-(
I assume you also have a mod_dotnet for running .aspx on your apache? :-)
Regards
Leon
> I suspect a large portion of those apache boxen are running
> Solaris and BSD as well as linux, but some shops (here for
> instance) do run apache on Winblows. Of course, we have an
> AS/400, too. :-(
I assume you also have a mod_dotnet for running .aspx on your apache? :-)
Regards
Leon
Apache = 69.70%
Microsoft = 20.26%
Sun = 2.85%
Zeus = 0.90%
Total = 93.71% (not sure where the other 6-7% went...)
I suspect a large portion of those apache boxen are running Solaris
and BSD as well as linux, but some shops (here for instance) do run
apache on Winblows. Of course, we have an AS/40
If Apache web server takes 60% where did the 40% go? IIS right? I think other
web servers are
almost negoligiable.
--- Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yan Hu wrote:
>
> >>Since linux has clearly more then 50% of the server market
> >>
> >>
> >Linux has never had more than 30% of th
Yan Hu wrote:
Since linux has clearly more then 50% of the server market
Linux has never had more than 30% of the server market
http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=P5013_0_6_0_C
Was probably referring to web server market share.
Dve
7 matches
Mail list logo
