Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-29 Thread Kevin Clifton
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:14:03 -0700, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LOL This is good. That will be tucked away for the appropriate time. Nice! > > > > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:26:37 -0700, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you want to bend some minds, map the contro

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Dakota Jack
LOL This is good. That will be tucked away for the appropriate time. Nice! On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:26:37 -0700, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you want to bend some minds, map the controller to "*.html" instead > (only works if you don't have any static html pages, of course).

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
If you want to bend some minds, map the controller to "*.html" instead (only works if you don't have any static html pages, of course). Then be prepared to smile while you answer the inevitable "how'd you do that" question :-). Craig On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:21:16 -0400, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PR

RE: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread Chappell, Simon P
sers Mailing List; Dakota Jack >Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do > > >What about *.spankMe ? (Think I might have lost that client) > > > >-- >James Mitchell >Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist >EdgeTech, Inc. >678.910.8017 >AIM: jmitchtx > >-

Re: [OT] Re: Hiding .do

2004-10-28 Thread James Mitchell
What about *.spankMe ? (Think I might have lost that client) -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thurs