Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-04-05 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
My best guess is that IE is trying to GET the contents pointed to by the link, and at the same time process your onClick event, and the two are conflicting. That is just a guess, but I have indeed seem similar behavior when using a link. One thing you can do is to not make it a link at all, inste

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-04-05 Thread zahid mohammed
Though this problem was resolved long time back, I was just wondering what the actual problem was. The problem was resolved just by replacing Next with Using the anchor tag, the HTTPWatch showed that the HTTP operation was aborted by IE, where as by using the button it went on the next page

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-02-18 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Aborted can happen when a proxy is involved, which has been suggested before as the source of your troubles. I think it would be in your best interest to purchase HTTPWatch to see the full details, or else find a free alternative... some options: http://www.siliconwold.com/interceptor/interce

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-02-18 Thread zahid mohammed
Hi Dave, I have used the basic edition of HttpWatch and found these results after clicking "next" Started Time size method Result Type 00:01:58.5120.004*POSTAborted* URL http://localhost:8080/WITRApplication/GetOtherSet.do?nextposition=10&rand=93395784 00:02:1

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-02-17 Thread Dave Newton
zahid mohammed wrote: > If something was fundamentally wrong then why would it work in "FIREFOX". > Perhaps because Firefox is less fundamentally broken than IE? > And moreover these two printlns are giving the same result in Firefox but > not in IE i.e after clicking next these are printing the

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-02-17 Thread zahid mohammed
If something was fundamentally wrong then why would it work in "FIREFOX". And moreover these two printlns are giving the same result in Firefox but not in IE i.e after clicking next these are printing the next page's first element. I am in the process of using HTTPWatch. I'll let u guys know the re

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-02-17 Thread Dave Newton
zahid mohammed wrote: > Yes. After clicking next "System.out.println" is printing the right name on > the console whereas "out.println" is printing the wrong name (first page > element) on the jsp. > Well, it certainly wouldn't be the first page element. It's after a logic:iterate and table etc.

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-02-17 Thread zahid mohammed
Yes. After clicking next "System.out.println" is printing the right name on the console whereas "out.println" is printing the wrong name (first page element) on the jsp. Thanks On 2/17/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > zahid mohammed wrote: > >> System.out.println("The First cand

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-02-16 Thread Dave Newton
zahid mohammed wrote: > One thing which surprises me is the difference in behavior of " > System.out.println" and the "out.println" statements. The former statement > is printing the write set of elements on the console whereas the " > out.println" is printing the wrong set of elements on the jsp.

Re: [OT] Re: Frustrating IE6 Caching problem......PLEASE HELP!!!!

2006-02-16 Thread zahid mohammed
I am not using any network "speedup" mechanisms. If the application was'nt working in Firefox I would have thought there might be some problem in the code, but its working great in firefox which means there is no problem in the code. One thing which surprises me is the difference in behavior of "