This is a gift from Mr. Don Brown back when he was working on the REST
plugin. I remember people asking for it. Speaking of mrdon, where's he
been? Maybe Atlassian is working him hard these days. ;-p
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> It is not a bug, it is a feature! /friday
>
> musachy
>
> On
It is not a bug, it is a feature! /friday
musachy
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Greg Lindholm wrote:
>
>
>
> dchicks wrote:
>>
>> We recently discovered, quite by accident, that we can cause our app
>> built on struts2 to NOT display ".action" on any of the URL's. I'd
>> simply like to find
Subject: Re: To .action or not to .action.
From: d...@holstein.com
To: user@struts.apache.org
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:24:35 -0400
I believe it's now the default behavior of struts 2.1.
We recently discovered, quite by accident, that we can cause our app
built on struts2 to N
Greg Lindholm wrote:
There was a change sometime between Struts 2.0.11 and Struts 2.1.6 where the
default list of action extensions (struts.action.extension) changed from
just 'action' to 'action' plus "" (no extension). This will cause requests
with no extension to be treated as an action.
A
dchicks wrote:
>
> We recently discovered, quite by accident, that we can cause our app
> built on struts2 to NOT display ".action" on any of the URL's. I'd
> simply like to find out if this is an intended feature or a possible
> defect? The difference is in how we start off our interactio
ssion.
> Subject: Re: To .action or not to .action.
> From: d...@holstein.com
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:24:35 -0400
>
>
>
> I believe it's now the default behavior of struts 2.1.
>
>
>
> We recently discovered, quite by
We don't really care whether Struts wants a ".action", or not. However,
it's confusing when it seems to pick up the behavior based on the URL
you used to enter into the system in the first place. Both URL's that I
posted in the original note work, but the resulting behavior after the
fact is
Becky.L.O'sulli...@healthnet.com wrote:
We've been posting our URLs that way (sans .action)
I've been sans action for months now.
Oh, URL mapping; I knew that.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.o
rs Mailing List"
cc
Please respond to
"Struts Users Subject
Mailing List" Re
I missed that memo :)
musachy
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:24 PM, wrote:
>
>
> I believe it's now the default behavior of struts 2.1.
>
>
>
> We recently discovered, quite by accident, that we can cause our app
> built on struts2 to NOT display ".action" on any of the URL's. I'd
> simply like to
I believe it's now the default behavior of struts 2.1.
We recently discovered, quite by accident, that we can cause our app
built on struts2 to NOT display ".action" on any of the URL's. I'd
simply like to find out if this is an intended feature or a possible
defect? The difference is in how
Are you using the Convention plugin?
musachy
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM, David C. Hicks wrote:
> We recently discovered, quite by accident, that we can cause our app built
> on struts2 to NOT display ".action" on any of the URL's. I'd simply like to
> find out if this is an intended featur
12 matches
Mail list logo
