I think if you change your isTestBool function to getTestBool it
should work. If you use a primative I think the isTestBool will work,
otherwise the 'object' version of a boolean needs to be a 'get'
method.
On 6/17/09, chumbobumbo wrote:
>
> Haven't tried it (had to move on) I just reverted to pr
Haven't tried it (had to move on) I just reverted to primitives and rely on
autoboxing (i.e. not having to make end to end change all the way to the
server side) when passing model to my web service.
newton.dave wrote:
>
> chumbobumbo wrote:
>> Yeah, it's called isTestBool (but I tried with ge
chumbobumbo wrote:
Yeah, it's called isTestBool (but I tried with getTestBool as well) neither
work, I enabled the debug console adn if I output the stack values in my
browser is says that 'no read method is available, listing testBool as
'String' whereas the testbool (primitive boolean) is repor
Yeah, it's called isTestBool (but I tried with getTestBool as well) neither
work, I enabled the debug console adn if I output the stack values in my
browser is says that 'no read method is available, listing testBool as
'String' whereas the testbool (primitive boolean) is reported correctly as
'tr
Hi,
can You verify that getter in action is called?
Add sysout or debug this place, because if it's not beeing called
there will be no result on the page. This would suite to nothing is
rendered in s:textfield, not the s:text!
Best greetings,
Pawel Wielgus.
2009/6/15, chumbobumbo :
>
> Sorry to r
Sorry to report but does
nothing, also
renders nothing in the
resulting html page; now I know that testBool is 'true' because I am running
it through the debugger.
I am also runnning this under Java 1.6 so autoboxing should work as noted in
one of the previous posts.
I am completely lost f
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Dale Newfield wrote:
> But remember that jsp code needs to be understandable not only to the
> compiler and tags that will implement it, but also humans that will be
> maintaining this code in the future. I'd suggest not saving any of those
> "extra keypresses" and
Jon Pearson wrote:
Also, in tags, you don't need to enclose the test in %{}
because it is evaluated anyway. Not that it'll change your result at
all, just thought I'd save you the extra couple of keypresses.
But remember that jsp code needs to be understandable not only to the
compiler and ta
t; Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 9:01 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Newbie (possibly RTFM) issue
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:40 AM,
> chumbobumbo wrote:
> >
> > I am using Struts 2.1.6
> >
> > if I have model like this:
> >
>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:40 AM, chumbobumbo wrote:
>
> I am using Struts 2.1.6
>
> if I have model like this:
>
> public class model {
> private Boolean testBool;
> private boolean testbool;
>
> ...
> public getters and setters for both follow
> ...
> }
>
> I find that in my co
10 matches
Mail list logo
